Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC) Next Step Systems US-NY-New York Post A Job | Post A Resume

[ Thanks to Craig Oda for this release. ]

BEAVERTON, OR, August 14, 2003 - The Open Source Development Lab (OSDL), a global consortium of leading technology companies dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Linux, today released a Q&A paper written by noted technology law and intellectual property expert Lawrence Rosen. The paper asks and answers key questions about SCO Group's current lawsuit against IBM and about its threatened litigation against users of Linux. The Q&A paper is designed to help Linux users with information to better understand the legal issues in this case, and to help them evaluate their own position with respect to SCO's demand for license fees from companies that continue to use Linux.

In his paper, Rosen identifies some of the legal issues raised by the SCO Group's claims as they relate to Linux development and usage. He does not offer legal advice, but rather frames some of the key questions that companies should ask their own counsel about their use of Linux. He points out that SCO has a long way to go before it can assert broad intellectual property claims against an operating system that was written by thousands of open source programmers worldwide.

"As we have noted before, we see no evidence that end users are slowing down their Linux implementation plans because of SCO's actions," said Stuart Cohen, OSDL CEO. "Mr. Rosen's paper is designed to help users assess whether or not they need to purchase a license to use Linux. We want all those in the Linux industry to know OSDL's position on this issue: Absent clear, open, and publicly available evidence that using Linux violates rights that SCO has not already freely conferred by distributing Linux under the GPL license over the course of several years, there is real doubt as to whether end users should purchase a license from SCO."

Key issues covered in Rosen's paper include:

• Extent to which the Linux operating system is involved in SCO vs. IBM
• Extent to which any single entity has copyright control over Linux
• Assessment of impact SCO vs. IBM may have on users of Linux

The real legal issue in this case is between two companies, not between a software provider and end users, nor between a company and an operating system, Rosen says. Users should be completely informed of their rights and obligations, if any, before they take steps to purchase a software license they may never need.

"To read the entire paper, please visit the OSDL Web site at:

http://www.osdl.org/docs/qa_re_sco_vs_ibm.pdf
http://www.osdl.org/docs/qa_re_sco_vs_ibm_html.html

Lawrence Rosen is founding partner of Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm, with offices in Los Altos Hills and Ukiah, California (www.rosenlaw.com). He also servers as general counsel and secretary of Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org), which reviews and approves open source licenses and educates the public about open source issues.

Related Stories:
CRN/AP: SCO Battle Rooted In Unix History(Aug 11, 2003)
Red Hat Attacks, SCO Counter Attacks(Aug 05, 2003)
VNUnet: SCO Hits Back at OSDL's Linux Paper(Aug 05, 2003)
OSDL: OSDL Releases Position Paper on SCO and Linux(Jul 31, 2003)

Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat     Talkback(s) Name  and Date   Great Reading    GH Aug 14, 2003, 23:12:39     100,000 embedded units with 2.4    gene smith Aug 15, 2003, 03:51:43     Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    apk Aug 15, 2003, 07:43:28     Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    Bojan Smojver Aug 15, 2003, 08:02:10     Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    Wol Aug 15, 2003, 08:47:35     Re: Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    Bill Nuxli Aug 15, 2003, 13:32:00     Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    C. Whitman Aug 15, 2003, 14:32:13     Re: Re: Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    Rufus Polson Aug 15, 2003, 16:34:15     Re: 100,000 embedded units with 2.4    Steve Aug 15, 2003, 21:49:06     Money for Nothing    Annie Aug 16, 2003, 00:38:46     Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page   Enter your comments below: * Your Name: * Your Email Address: * Subject: CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address] * Comments: Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content. Fields marked with * are required!