LinuxPlanet: Getting the Real Facts: How Industry Analyst Reports Can Trick Readers

"Microsoft's 'Get the Facts' advertising campaign makes the claim that Windows offers a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) than Linux, and backs it up with reports from well-known industry analyst firms. But Linux advocates claim that the TCO of Linux is lower, and some other studies back them up. How can you separate the fact from the fiction? In Part 2 of this series, I'll offer tips on how to read a study and make up your own mind about its relevance. Next month, in Part 3, I'll analyze specific studies referenced by Microsoft in their 'Get the Facts' campaign.

"Various studies on the total cost of ownership (TCO) of Windows versus Linux have arrived at vastly different conclusions. How is this possible? The short answer is that if you are abstract enough with your goals and methodology, are selective with the costs that you include, and ask the right questions, then you can arrive at any conclusion you want.

"Here are some of the things you need to consider as you read a report..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• LinuxPlanet: The Yin and Yang of Open Source Commerce, Part 4(Nov 04, 2005)
• LinuxPlanet: Getting the Real Facts: How to Read an Analyst's Report(Oct 13, 2005)
• ZDNet: Is Microsoft's Genuine Advantage Program Good for Linux?(Jul 28, 2005)
• Digital Copyright Canada: Get the Facts, Get the FUD, or Simply Get Distracted?(Jul 13, 2005)