Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Tech Comics: "Groundhog Day"

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:KernelTrap: OpenBSD: Intel Accused Of Being "An Open Source Fraud"
KernelTrap: OpenBSD: Intel Accused Of Being "An Open Source Fraud"
Oct 2, 2006, 14 :15 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (7432 reads)

"Damien Bergamini started a thread on the OpenBSD -misc mailing list in which he summarized Intel's policy toward open-source software being to 'make us look like we're open-source friendly by opening a project on sourceforge,' and, 'give the open-source community the bare minimum so that they can serve as our beta-testers.' Damien released a reverse engineered blob-free driver for an Intel wireless chipset earlier this year, but work is slow as Intel does not freely provide documentation to the chipset. OpenBSD's battle with Intel has been ongoing for some time leading project creator Theo de Raadt to say, 'before we ask a vendor, we have already lost (ie. the device does not work). When a vendor says no, we have lost nothing further--there is no way we can lose further than having the device not work. We can only win, and then the device works. So there is no point in giving up until we win back the rights to write software for the hardware that we have purchased.' As before, the goal is to get Intel to provide a freely distributable binary firmware..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
All About Linux: Does an OS Have to be Costlier than the Hardware on Which it is Run?(Sep 15, 2006)
LinuxHardware: Intel's Core 2 Under Linux(Aug 23, 2006)
Phoronix: Intel 2006-08-09 Graphics Preview(Aug 11, 2006)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I use AMD all the way, motherboards with ...   Intel::   
GH
Oct 2, 2006, 20:28:45
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP