Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions

Kernel Log: Coming in 2.6.32 (Part 3) - Storage

TV Mythos Renewed: MythTV 0.22 with Many Improvements

Enhancing openSUSE 11.2: Adding Repositories and Packages

A Northwest Nobel option? (Linus for the Nobel Peace prize)

SECURITY: Cloud Computing Security Benefits, Risks and Recommendations

Keeping score in test-driven development with Python, PyLint, unittest, doctest,




Arcsight Engineer
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-DC-Washington

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Kerneltrap: Linux: Accessing Files With O_DIRECT
Kerneltrap: Linux: Accessing Files With O_DIRECT
Jan 12, 2007, 19 :30 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (11930 reads)

(Other stories by Jeremy)

"A thread on the lkml began with a query about using O_DIRECT when opening a file. An early white paper written by Andrea Arcangeli to describe the O_DIRECT patch before it was merged into the 2.4 kernel explains, "with O_DIRECT the kernel will do DMA directly from/to the physical memory pointed [to] by the userspace buffer passed as [a] parameter to the read/write syscalls. So there will be no CPU and memory bandwidth spent in the copies between userspace memory and kernel cache, and there will be no CPU time spent in kernel in the management of the cache (like cache lookups, per-page locks etc..).""

Complete Story

Related Stories:
KernelTrap: KVM Paravirtualization(Jan 09, 2007)
O'Reilly Linux DevCenter: Pragmatic Questions about Binary-Only Drivers(Dec 28, 2006)
KernelTrap: Revisiting the Hyper-Threading Vulnerability(Dec 05, 2006)
KernelTrap: GCC, Useful Versus Useless Warnings(Nov 30, 2006)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I'm posting the same thing I posted  ...   Buffering   
Tony OBryan
Jan 12, 2007, 21:04:18
 
> Removable storage is the best argument ...   Re: Buffering   
Rainer Weikusat
Jan 14, 2007, 18:57:00
 
> It is more of an invitation to learn h ...   Re: Re: Buffering   
Tony OBryan
Jan 16, 2007, 15:38:59
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs