ODF vs. OOXML: War of the Words Chapter 5

"One of the two articles of faith that Eric Kriss and Peter Quinn embraced in drafting their evolving ETRM was this: products built to 'open standards' are more desirable than those that aren't. Superficially, the concept made perfect sense--only buy products that you can mix and match. That way, you can take advantage of both price competition as well as a wide selection of alternative products from multiple vendors, each with its own value-adding features. And if things don't work out, well, you're not locked in, and can swap out the loser and shop for a winner.

"But did that make as much sense with routers and software as it did with light bulbs and lamps? And in any event, if this was such a great idea, why hadn't their predecessors been demanding open standards-based products for years? Finally, what exactly was that word 'open' supposed to mean...?"

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• ODF vs. OOXML: War of the Words Chapter 4(Jan 01, 2008)
• ODF vs. OOXML: War of the Words Chapter 3(Dec 10, 2007)
• ODF vs. OOXML: War of the Words Chapter 2(Dec 03, 2007)
• ODF vs. OOXML: War of the Words(Nov 26, 2007)