Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:The Tragedy of the Anti-Commons
The Tragedy of the Anti-Commons
Apr 23, 2008, 23 :15 UTC (5 Talkback[s]) (4729 reads)

(Other stories by Brendan Scott)

[ Thanks to Brendan Scott for this link. ]

"Misapplication of 'value for money' requirements when purchasing software results in poor value for money--Government purchasing policies for software tend to support the creation of monopolies.

"Government purchasing has effects on the price paid by citizens for the product purchased. In some cases purchasing produces volume which permits scale discounts and therefore a net benefit to citizens who also purchase the product. However, in the case of lock in software Government purchasing can create a monopoly in the software which leads to increased costs for citizen purchasers and a net detriment for society as a whole. It is not appropriate for value for money policies to be assessed on a per acquisition basis when software is being acquired. Doing so will almost certainly create net costs for the community when considered in the aggregate..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Silicon.com: Linux in Government--Better Late Than Never(Mar 03, 2006)
Silicon.com: Devil's Advocate: Open Source for Government(Feb 22, 2006)
InfoWorld: Mandating Incompetence?(Feb 04, 2006)
Technetra: Why is a Government IT Procurement Policy Needed? How Can Open Source Help?(Feb 03, 2006)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Several years ago I knew someone who was ...   State purchasing policies and waste   
Theodore Kilgore
Apr 24, 2008, 04:24:22
 
http://www.mises.org/story/1471"The well ...   "Government" is what is inefficient.   
Bob_Robertson
Apr 24, 2008, 11:47:36
 
Quoting: "The well-known inefficiencies  ...   Not "Government" but large organizations, I would   
Theodore Kilgore
Apr 24, 2008, 18:59:11
 
> "Private organizations which are too l ...   Re: Yes.   
Bob_Robertson
Apr 25, 2008, 15:36:02
 
Your logic is so far off that I would no ...   Re: Yes   
Theodore Kilgore
Apr 25, 2008, 23:30:43
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP