Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3

60 Fantastic Free Android Apps

Ready for Another Linux Tablet? Meet the Rugged Trimble Yuma



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Creative Commons Asks How You Define "Non-Commercial"
Creative Commons Asks How You Define "Non-Commercial"
Dec 5, 2008, 06 :03 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (3939 reads)

(Other stories by Kristin Shoemaker)

[ Thanks to sakgarg for this link. ]

"The Creative Commons team asks any one willing to take some time and fill out their questionnaire prior to December 7th. The survey is completely anonymous, and the study is open to the general public.

"Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier makes the interesting observation on his "Community, Incorporated" blog that one of the reasons the Open Source Definition doesn't allow clauses restricting commercial use is that "commercial" is a slippery term to define, particularly on the web. I've run into this dilemma more than once. If I need an image for a piece of writing, I either use the Firefox search function for Creative Commons licensed content, or I go directly to a site that I know features this sort of content. While many of the license terms are quite clear (share alike, attribution), others are vague. The definition of a derivative work can be tough, but it's not one I come up against so much. The "non-commercial" is almost always the sticking point."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Saving the Intellectual Commons with Open Source(Dec 04, 2008)
Healing the Rift Between Wikipedia and Creative Commons(Nov 04, 2008)
Severed Fifth Album Debut - Creative Commons(Oct 22, 2008)
Online Sharing with Creative Commons(Sep 05, 2008)
Creative Commons Releases Free Content/Software with LiveContent DVD(Mar 14, 2008)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP