Lies, Damn Lies and File Systems Benchmarks
Aug 12, 2009, 13:32 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Jeffrey B. Layton)
""There are lies, damn lies, and then benchmarks." It's an
overused phrase but it does make a point: Benchmarks have become so
abused that no longer are they used to provide useful information
for making decisions or for improving solutions. While this is
something we seem to inheritly know, it was recently backed up with
solid data. The cliche, it turns out, is on the mark.
"Recently a paper was published in Byte and Switch that examined
nine years of storage and file system benchmarking. It's an
important paper. In this article we will summarize the paper's
findings. Looking ahead we plan to use them as the basis of future
benchmarking results published in this column.
"Yes, it's that good."
- Boot On BTRFS With Debian(Aug 04, 2009)
- Multicore Video Decoding with MPlayer, Part 1(Jul 27, 2009)
- Intel Celeron Dual-Core Linux Performance(Jul 24, 2009)
- A Detailed Guide To Phoronix Test Suite 2.0(Jul 24, 2009)
- Netbook Performance: Ubuntu vs. OpenSolaris(Jul 15, 2009)
- Clusters That Produce: 25 Open HPC Applications(Jul 14, 2009)
- Btrfs v0.19 Brings Some Gains, Some Losses(Jul 13, 2009)
- EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Benchmarks(Jun 29, 2009)
- Benchmarks Of Fedora 9 Through 11(Jun 17, 2009)