Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Hands off the Gimp

Course: Using LDAP

Bazaar for Subversion users, part 1 - the basics

Firefox 3.5 - A Really Impressive Release

Linux Migration Guide: Finding Linux Equivalents to Your Favorite Windows Programs

Tiny Core Linux 2.1 Review

5 Top of the Line Twitter Desktop Clients for Linux

SECURITY: How Microsoft benefits from Conficker

Linux Vendors Head to the Cloud in Search of Cash

Editor's Note: Freedom is Not Embarrassing




Exchange Quest Migration opening
AMS Staffing Solutions
US-VA-Richmond

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Dan Lawrance gives his view on why he believes Linux won't take over Microsoft.
Dan Lawrance gives his view on why he believes Linux won't take over Microsoft.
Nov 10, 1998, 11 :49 UTC (26 Talkback[s]) (2288 reads)

By Dan Lawrance

It's all very well dreaming of a world where Linux takes over Microsoft. But, it's not going to happen, at least not in the way most people here seem to think. Linux is a wonderful system, and I've been using it for more than 5 years. But, on my main machine, I have NT and Windows 98.

Why? Because I, like 100+ million others, like to play games, and use a decent word processor. Neither is possible under Linux, YET. I know about Wine, and the strides being made there, but what's the point of crowing about open standards and all the anti-Microsoft stuff we hear every day, when those same Open people have to then devote a huge amount of time duplicating and reverse-engineering what Microsoft have already done? DirectX is a fact of life, for instance, and it's going to take something a hell of a lot bigger than Linux to change that - and even if Linux had DirectX, it's never going to catch up to MS's implementation!

Linux has a place in the world, and that is not the place that MS currently has a huge hold in - the corporate market. I hope and pray Linux continues to grow and develop, but I can see the day when a company (Red Hat maybe) has to deliver a corporate-desktop standard of distribution, and in order to do that they will have to change the way it's developed and delivered - which is of course against everything Linux people stand for!

Linux must go its own way, and not try to ape MS. If the current development trends continue, we're going to end up with a cheap, tricky-to-install version of Windows 9x, although technically 'better' underneath. I think that would be a tremendous waste of what Linux could and can do.

It currently delivers a superb, and free, web-serving platform (with Apache), and a useful, free tool for students, hobbyists and programmers alike to have UNIX to play with, develop for and learn on.

It is also ideal for small and medium scale file-, print- and network service-serving, and that part of its market seems to be growing nicely. People aren't afraid of Linux any more, because they're seeing its name being mentioned in the press, and even distributions are apprearing on the front of popular magazines.

But what most people want is to be able to pop in a CD from the local store and play the latest games, and churn out their posters, letters, whatever, in a friendly and consistent way that they can swap stuff with their mates, use the latest hardware straight away and so on - and MS is the only system where that happens now. Live with it.

Linux does not have to attack MS, although it seems certain to need defence against MS. And hey, if MS has to change the way it does things to reflect a Linux-aware world, then great! Linus (Torvalds) won!

The world for Linux is a very different one than for MS. Concentrate on making Linux a bit easier, better at what it already does, and by all means widen what it can do - but don't get all uppity about what MS is or is not doing. Linux is better than that. Ignore Bill, stick to Linux.


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Try using a version of Linux less than 2 ...   No apps for Linux...again...?   
Steve Hall
Nov 10, 1998, 12:06:44
 
I agree with Dan, we should develop Linu ...   Dan Lawrences Post   
George Metz
Jan 24, 1999, 18:20:58
 
Some of these fud talking points you tro ...   ew, more fud....   
Joel Stone
Jan 6, 1999, 00:26:13
 
5 years using Linux and he hasn't fo ...   Paper clip = word processor?   
Felix Finch
Jan 28, 1999, 16:04:58
 
If you're happy with 98 and NT on yo ...   Linux can do different things for different people   
Perry Piplani
Dec 26, 1998, 18:47:41
 
A few quick comments:I keep an Win95 par ...   From a certain point of view   
Dennis Edmonds
Dec 18, 1998, 09:13:08
 
The assumptions behind your post are unt ...   Untrue   
Sengan
Jan 28, 1999, 16:08:24
 
Uh, let's wake up, folks! Linux left ...   Get with the 90's, dude   
Tim Ellis
Feb 3, 1999, 19:58:46
 
Dan Lawrance says he uses his computer f ...   Non-geek Linux   
Gareth Barnard
Feb 3, 1999, 20:23:22
 
One of the best kept blubic secrets is W ...   How do you spell W I N E ?   
Richard Tilmann
Nov 10, 1998, 12:53:12
 
Why should Linux emulate and emulate and ...   Direct X and other stuff   
Chia, Chin Yau
Jan 22, 1999, 23:03:11
 
Dear Dan,Ignore Linux.  Stick with whini ...   http://www.kmfms.com   
jfm3
Nov 10, 1998, 13:41:19
 
>It is also ideal for small and medium s ...   small-medium scale?   
Crowbar
Nov 10, 1998, 14:02:02
 
Hi Dan,Linux has gone far away from the  ...   Real focus ?   
Prasad Samarajiva
Feb 3, 1999, 10:14:58
 
You are missing the point.  Creating is  ...   Grand Vision.   
Shane R. Stixrud
Nov 10, 1998, 14:51:43
 
Yes, Microsoft is not going to disappear ...   Beyond the IT Event Horizon   
Simon James
Nov 29, 1998, 20:11:38
 
The point is that I don't want to ha ...   I want only Linux   
Corey Appleby
Nov 10, 1998, 16:48:04
 
In rebuttal to Dan Lawrence I offer this ...   Why Linux will win   
Henry Cross
Jan 14, 1999, 20:28:33
 
Who the heck is Dan Lawrence? Why should ...   Huh?   
John Bell
Feb 3, 1999, 19:14:03
 
I must whole heartedly disagree with man ...   Lack of foresight   
Matthew Pavlovich
Nov 10, 1998, 19:38:27
 
Dan writes why Linux won't overtake  ...   Huh? Dan, have you been asleep?   
Jerry Kreps
Jan 30, 1999, 12:28:20
 
That's the beauty of Linux - we can  ...   Be greedy   
Greg Mildenhall
Jan 14, 1999, 02:10:18
 
www.linux-hw.com/~eric/fud101.html ...   FUD...   
Eric Walker
Nov 10, 1998, 23:27:14
 
I'm new to Linux - I installed S.u.S ...   Being a newcommer, I dont agree   
Ludwin Fischer
Nov 25, 1998, 10:09:53
 
I happen to agree with a few things he s ...   Who's Dan Lawrence?   
Victor McCoy
Nov 11, 1998, 14:32:36
 
Dear Mr. Lawrance,I read with interest y ...   Maybe I can help you Mr. Lawrance...   
Michel Dumais
Nov 11, 1998, 13:34:54
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP