Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Hands off the Gimp

Course: Using LDAP

Bazaar for Subversion users, part 1 - the basics

Firefox 3.5 - A Really Impressive Release

Linux Migration Guide: Finding Linux Equivalents to Your Favorite Windows Programs

Tiny Core Linux 2.1 Review

5 Top of the Line Twitter Desktop Clients for Linux

SECURITY: How Microsoft benefits from Conficker

Linux Vendors Head to the Cloud in Search of Cash

Editor's Note: Freedom is Not Embarrassing




Exchange Quest Migration opening
AMS Staffing Solutions
US-VA-Richmond

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Why the UCITA is good for Open Source Software
Why the UCITA is good for Open Source Software
Jul 2, 1999, 14 :52 UTC (22 Talkback[s]) (15943 reads)

Thanks to Scott E. Regener for this link.

Scott E. Regener believes it could help Open Source Software...

"As many of you now know, a new law called the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA) is being considered. This law would go to great lengths to decrease the rights of end users and increase the rights of the software companies producing the software. Included in this act are provisions that would allow a company to 1) remove all responsibility for bugs, including known ones; 2) allow the producer of the software to remotely disable programs when they believe the license has been violated; 3) remove all legal protections from the user for damages maliciously caused by a product."

"UCITA is being fought by a great many people from a great many different backgrounds. People are fighting it for different reasons. Whenever a new law is passed, especially one that changes the structure of business, there are winners and losers. Few argue that commercial software users would be harmed by this act. Most think the gains would go to the commercial software developers. It is my belief that both commerical software users and producers would be harmed by this act."

Complete Story

Related stories:
Infoworld Circulating Petition to Halt UCITA
InfoWorld: UCITA could provide the license to kill those companies that support it


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
The author of this piece paints a rosy p ...   You're right ... mostly   
Chris Nelson
Jul 2, 1999, 15:17:38
 
Doesn't UCITA pretty much destroy SA ...   SAMBA, etc and Reverse Eng.   
Dale Pontius
Jul 2, 1999, 15:18:11
 
UCITA can allow software vendors to proh ...   I agree EXCEPT...   
David F. Skoll
Jul 2, 1999, 15:30:34
 
Something that I thought about while I l ...   Something not yet mentioned about UCITA   
Jeff
Jul 2, 1999, 16:08:02
 

Good observation re: reverse engineerin ...   Reverse engineering   
Scott Johnson
Jul 2, 1999, 16:43:21
 
This essay reminds me of the reasoning o ...   sounds like "The worse, the better"   
Eugene Koontz
Jul 2, 1999, 16:55:19
 
Paying someone to kill Bill Gates and ot ...   Maybe, but the bill is still WRONG   
Kevin Atkinson
Jul 2, 1999, 17:07:07
 
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! The free software ca ...   Re: Maybe, but the bill is still WRONG   
Josh Hansen
Jul 2, 1999, 17:39:31
 
The out right ban of reverse engineering ...   Passing of the bill, could make linux illegal   
mike
Jul 2, 1999, 18:01:13
 
The biggest thing that popped into my he ...   Security hole you could drive a stake through..   
Daniel Weber
Jul 2, 1999, 19:11:38
 
A scenario that makes this *very* bad fo ...   Remote shutdown your BIOS?   
John Stracke
Jul 2, 1999, 20:02:39
 
What if it is determined that reverse en ...   Reverse Engineering Thoughts   
Curtis R Anderson
Jul 2, 1999, 23:59:28
 
  I predict all Open Source advocates an ...   Migration   
Frazers
Jul 3, 1999, 01:09:17
 
The article talks about Free Sotware as  ...   Disclaimers   
Ross Combs
Jul 3, 1999, 01:38:59
 
Here in Italy law grants explicitly the  ...   Re: Migration   
Alessandro Coppo
Jul 3, 1999, 03:36:04
 
In the US, maybe. But in the European Un ...   Re: I agree EXCEPT...   
Vidar Hokstad
Jul 3, 1999, 06:36:41
 
This seems to be a good law...
If you ar ...   M$   
Cris van Pelt
Jul 3, 1999, 08:58:24
 
Really, read the license of virtually an ...   Reverse Engineering Is Already Illegal   
Andrew B. Arthur aka AArthur
Jul 3, 1999, 10:58:00
 
That will _never_ happen.
 ...   Re: Something not yet mentioned about UCITA   
DF
Aug 1, 1999, 23:45:24
 
Here's a loophole...
what if they ju ...   Re: Reverse engineering   
DF
Aug 1, 1999, 23:47:49
 
Ex post facto laws are illegal.
 ...   Re: Reverse Engineering Thoughts   
DF
Aug 1, 1999, 23:51:04
 
I think that is is stupid that they are  ...   Stay!!!   
John
Aug 17, 2006, 09:03:23
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP