Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Linux Tips & Tricks: Converting PDF-s to pictures in Linux

Ultimate Firefox Productivity Tips: For the Geeks.

GoldenDict: A Dictionary Nugget

Would You Like Linux With Your Jello?

Why I Use Linux: Lofton’s Story

Go to Toys 'R Us for your Linux netbook needs

Sun xVM VirtualBox 3.0: Virtual Developer's Delight

Apple Wary of Ogg Theora: No Agreement Yet on HTML5 Video Standard

Freedom is not Free for Countries nor Computer Users

Eyecandy Themes For Ubuntu - Download directly from Synaptic - No More Hassles




Senior Windows Engineer (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Wired: Hits Keep On Coming Against MS
Wired: Hits Keep On Coming Against MS
Sep 2, 1999, 20 :27 UTC (13 Talkback[s]) (9093 reads)

(Other stories by Declan McCullagh)

"Some experts have have long argued that MS Windows was inherently insecure, but now a Microsoft manager has confirmed it.

It all started in a technical discussion forum during last week's parade of security flaws in Windows products that were uncovered by outside experts."

"A few posts later, Peter Torr, MS Windows Script program manager, joined the fray. He defended MS Windows NT as an operating system that's 'generally considered' less prone to break-ins than either Unix or Linux.

But what about Windows 95 or 98, used by millions of customers worldwide?

'If you're talking about Windows 9x, forget it,' Torr wrote. 'No one ever (seriously) claimed that it was secure.' "

Complete Story

Related stories: 
SRO: How Hotmail Blew It (Sep 02, 1999)
CNET News.com: Microsoft backtracks, says flaw also in Office 2000 (Aug 20, 1999)
Security Portal: How big of a chink in Microsoft's armor? (Aug 02, 1999)
Wired: Worm Zeroes In On Microsoft (Jun 13, 1999)
InfoWorld: Judge in Microsoft case questions browser security (Jun 11, 1999)
LA Times: Security of Microsoft's Products Is Questioned (Mar 31, 1999)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
He isn't admitting to anything that  ...   So what?   
David
Sep 2, 1999, 20:41:33
 
......"MS Windows NT as an operating sys ...   MS Security   
Eric Fletcher
Sep 2, 1999, 20:44:16
 
I dont think anyone really argues that M ...   There was no arguing   
William Doors
Sep 2, 1999, 20:52:07
 
Because there's very little you can  ...   NT is more secure...   
Robert Crawford
Sep 2, 1999, 21:00:36
 
Well the following http://www.att.com/pr ...   Does NT have B1 or higher security levels?   
ellil
Sep 2, 1999, 21:49:47
 
Unfortunately Windows 9X is not on its w ...   Re: So what?   
Jim Reavis
Sep 2, 1999, 22:05:55
 
And in related news, Peter Torr, former  ...   And in related news...   
AJWM
Sep 2, 1999, 22:22:20
 
I am *not* insecure. At least, I don&#39 ...   Re: There was no arguing   
Windows
Sep 2, 1999, 22:45:44
 
One word.

Melissa.

'nuff said.

KH ...   NT Vs. UNIX security.   
Kevin HUdson
Sep 2, 1999, 23:31:27
 
The only time they down play the quality ...   98 ver 2 isn't selling   
brett
Sep 3, 1999, 05:11:47
 
I've always loved this quote from an ...   Another Quotes from a MS Manager   
Anne
Sep 3, 1999, 15:17:24
 
>Besides, how can a cracker do nasty thi ...   Re: NT is more secure   
James Buster
Sep 7, 1999, 21:28:06
 
>Well the following http://www.att.com/p ...   Re: Does NT have B1 or higher security levels?   
James Buster
Sep 7, 1999, 21:30:54
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP