Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Scripting the Vim editor, Part 2: User-defined functions

LinuxPR: Florida Linux Show 2009 Orlando Teams Up

How-To: Install FrostWire 4.18.0 in Debian Lenny

What is Google's Goal with its Chrome OS?

Red Hat: From manic acquisitions to focused execution

Google Frenzy and Mono Mania

Installing VirtualBox 3.0 On An Ubuntu 9.04 Desktop

Copy Your Linux Install to a Different Partition or Drive

Licensing 101 for Open Source Projects: Choosing an Open Source License

Internet radio sites, music industry reach agreement over royalties




Security Engineer (PA)
Next Step Systems
US-PA-Philadelphia

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Creative Commons Asks How You Define "Non-Commercial"
Creative Commons Asks How You Define "Non-Commercial"
Dec 5, 2008, 06 :03 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (2138 reads)

(Other stories by Kristin Shoemaker)

[ Thanks to sakgarg for this link. ]

"The Creative Commons team asks any one willing to take some time and fill out their questionnaire prior to December 7th. The survey is completely anonymous, and the study is open to the general public.

"Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier makes the interesting observation on his "Community, Incorporated" blog that one of the reasons the Open Source Definition doesn't allow clauses restricting commercial use is that "commercial" is a slippery term to define, particularly on the web. I've run into this dilemma more than once. If I need an image for a piece of writing, I either use the Firefox search function for Creative Commons licensed content, or I go directly to a site that I know features this sort of content. While many of the license terms are quite clear (share alike, attribution), others are vague. The definition of a derivative work can be tough, but it's not one I come up against so much. The "non-commercial" is almost always the sticking point."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Saving the Intellectual Commons with Open Source(Dec 04, 2008)
Healing the Rift Between Wikipedia and Creative Commons(Nov 04, 2008)
Severed Fifth Album Debut - Creative Commons(Oct 22, 2008)
Online Sharing with Creative Commons(Sep 05, 2008)
Creative Commons Releases Free Content/Software with LiveContent DVD(Mar 14, 2008)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP