Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

Hannah Montana Linux X86 Basic Edition

Digium Asterisk: Rising in the Fall?

Review: Gwenview 2.3 - The Powerful KDE4 Image Viewer

PCLinuxOS Minime 09.1 on my Thinkpad T61

Virtualbox 3.0: Virtualization Brilliance

10 Free Online Tools to Improve Browsing

Hands on with Mint 7

Editor's Note: Linux, FOSS, and the Time-Honored Tradition of Charging More for Less

A Ruritania of the Mind

Datawind Announces the PocketSurfer3




Senior Windows Engineer (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Destined Incompatibility of OO.o's OOXML Implementation
Destined Incompatibility of OO.o's OOXML Implementation
Jan 6, 2009, 17 :34 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (3633 reads)

(Other stories by HUNG Chao-Kuei)

[ Thanks to Chao-Kuei Hung for this link. ]

"Despite all the OOXML scandals that make 6 countries question the compromised process of ISO and IEC and despite the legal threat behind OOXML, Microsoft is still able to confuse enough people to believe that OOXML is an open format. What seems to be obvious to us who follow the development may not be so to the non-technical public. The goal of this post is to bring awareness of the danger of OOXML to more non-technical public by cutting through the confusing technical and legal fog, and by making Microsoft answer directly, in layman's terms, to the two questions: that of openness and that of legality."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
The OpenSuse FAQ Touched me in a Bad Place(Dec 17, 2008)
Leaked: Microsoft Pays Companies to Recommend Windows(Dec 02, 2008)
Open Letter: Independent Conformance Testing Needed for ODF and OOXML(Nov 18, 2008)
OOXML Documentation: ISO Concerned(Oct 09, 2008)
OOXML Leaked: The Stuff ISO Doesn’t Want You to Have (Updated)(Oct 04, 2008)
The CONSEGI 2008 Declaration: Six Nations "Just Say No" to ISO/IEC(Sep 02, 2008)
IBM VP: Office OpenXML a Dead End, Microsoft Will Back ODF(Aug 14, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I am unclear what this rant is doing in  ...   This guy has no idea   
Someone
Jan 7, 2009, 08:41:37
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP