NY Times: Group Says It Beat Music Security but Can't Reveal How

"Edward W. Felten, an associate professor of computer science at Princeton , is perhaps best known for his role in the Microsoft antitrust trial. During the trial, where he demonstrated a program that he said stripped the Internet Explorer browser from the Windows operating system, he spent hours explaining what he had done and how he had done it."

"But the professor has been far less forthcoming about a more recent hack, and at a conference last week he explained why: Lawyers have advised him that publicizing the details of his tinkering could violate a 1998 federal law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

"As part of an industry competition to test the security of a digital music copyright protection system developed by a group of entertainment and technology companies, Professor Felten was part of a group that says it successfully disabled the system. But he said he was reluctant to make public the details of how it was done because the 1998 law made it a crime to manufacture or "offer to the public" a way to gain unauthorized access to any copyright-protected work that has been secured by a technology like encryption."

Complete Story [Free registration required]

Related Stories:

• SecurityFocus: Hospital Records Hacked; Initial Access Gained via Linux Box(Dec 07, 2000)
• Washington Times: Digital dilemma(Nov 14, 2000)
• The Register: Hacker research team disputes 'hack SDMI' results (Nov 09, 2000)
• Salon: SDMI: We're not hacked yet(Nov 08, 2000)
• InfoWorld: Legitimate concerns vs. free speech: Who defines the rules for the Net?(Nov 07, 2000)
• Advogato: SDMI's Chiariglione: "I reject the witch hunt... against content protection." (Oct 25, 2000)
• Princeton Team Cracks SDMI(Oct 23, 2000)
• Salon: Cracked or not? The SDMI saga continues(Oct 19, 2000)
• The Register: SDMI was cracked, and is doomed: count on it(Oct 19, 2000)
• Salon: SDMI cracked!(Oct 13, 2000)