Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3

60 Fantastic Free Android Apps

Ready for Another Linux Tablet? Meet the Rugged Trimble Yuma

How can the layman get involved with free software?

RIM Commits to Open Source BlackBerry 10 Native SDK

Oracle Staking Claim in Open-Source 'R' Language



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - Nukenabber, IE 5 privacy, hits on port 111
SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - Nukenabber, IE 5 privacy, hits on port 111
Jun 17, 2001, 18 :00 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (6543 reads)

(Other stories by Buffy Overflow)

Questions this week cover NukeNabber, http_referrer, restricting Win98, port 111, http redirection, and DShield.org:

  • I use a freeware product called NukeNabber. Link at: http://www.dynamsol.com/puppet/ It sounds an alarm and blocks the scanned or affected port automatically for a configurable period of time. Is this good enough? Do I need a product that has more firewall functionality?
  • I would like to know how I can block Internet Explorer 5 of releasing my last visited site to the next web site?
  • How can I deny to the user to install on client windows 98 under windows 2000 server?
  • Lately I am getting A LOT of hits on port 111 at home. Currently I am blocking it but according to my firewall logs I get around 30 - 50 hits a day from all over the world. I know that port 111 is the RPC port under NT (I'm running 2000 Pro.) and I was just wondering is it used for anything else. I've tried looking around on the web for any exploits involving port 111 but I did not find anything. But still, getting that many hits a day is suspicious to me.
  • I have a simple problem. I want that if any user types in http:\url.com..by mistake then it should get redirected to https:\url.com. I am using apachewebserver with jserv. Please tell me how to do about it.

Complete Story

Related Stories:
SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - Secure FTP, NAT/firewalls, syslog, and certificate authorities. (May 20, 2001)
SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - Blocking Internet Access, Apache Proxy Request(May 13, 2001)
SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - Logging root commands, xinetd, bcc e-mail tracking (May 04, 2001)
SecurityPortal: Ask Buffy - After an Attack; Firewalls and Intrusion Detection; SSL; lpd.(Apr 26, 2001)
Security Portal: Ask Buffy: Strange log entries; LDAP; Nessus; SSL; and restricting VPN access.(Apr 05, 2001)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP