TechRepublic.com: By the numbers: Comparing Windows security to Linux
Sep 26, 2001, 19:40 (25 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by John McCormick)
"In TechRepublic discussions about the virtues of Linux
vs. Windows, Linux enthusiasts love to point out that their OS is
much more secure. They complain that Windows and its applications
are full of bugs and poorly written code and that Windows is more
susceptible to viruses.
Of course, administrators who work primarily with Windows take
exception to these arguments. They believe that Windows can be
secured just as well as any other operating system and that Windows
is simply targeted more often because its use is so widespread.
One way to get to the bottom of this dispute is to look at the
numbers. In this case, let's examine the statistics on discovered
vulnerabilities tracked by Security Focus Bugtraq. One word of
warning: These numbers may just surprise you."
Complete Story [ Free registration required. -ed.
- Yahoo!/ZDNet: Insurer: Microsoft Is A Costly Choice
(Aug 21, 2001)
- Crypto-Gram: Insurance and the Future of Network Security
(Mar 16, 2001)
- NewsFactor Network: The Great Security Debate: Linux vs. Windows(Mar 06, 2001)
- VNU Net: Security is out of step with ebusiness; Linux rated least secure platform to store data(Jan 12, 2001)
- The Register: MS claims copyright on Windows bugs; seeks to block BugTraq(Dec 08, 2000)
- ShowMeLinux.com: MS Security & Hacking... A More Informed Community, or More Bars on the Windows?(Dec 05, 2000)
- LinuxWorld: Open source closes backdoors - Security through code obscurity provides false confidence(Nov 12, 2000)
- LinuxSecurity.com: Linux Security from a Windows Security Expert's Perspective(Sep 22, 2000)
- WindowsITSecurity.com: Are Security Bugs an Unfair Liability?(Aug 11, 2000)