Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Amahi Linux Home Server 4.2

Matthias Ettrich Receives German Federal Cross of Merit

Using Windows Is Like...

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?




Systems Implementation Engineer II – Disk-Based Back-Up/Replication/RedHat Linux (PA)
Next Step Systems
US-PA-Philadelphia

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Wired: Did MS Pay for Open-Source Scare?
Wired: Did MS Pay for Open-Source Scare?
Jun 5, 2002, 14 :30 UTC (40 Talkback[s]) (14824 reads)

(Other stories by Michelle Delio)

"'Opening the Open Source Debate,' a white paper slated to be released Friday by the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution, indicates that open-source software is inherently less secure than proprietary software. The report warns governments against relying on open-source software for national security.

"Open-source advocates wondered if the white paper is actually a veiled Microsoft response to recent reports of rising government and military interest in open-source systems.

"A Microsoft spokesman confirmed that Microsoft provides funding to the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution.

Complete Story

Related Stories:
ZDNet: Study: Open Source Poses Security Risks(May 31, 2002)
Washington Post: Open-Source Fight Flares At Pentagon(May 23, 2002)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
and un-biased such a secret?? It's j ...   why is something independant   
yuri vil
Jun 5, 2002, 14:58:03
 
....A Microsoft spokesman did say that o ...   Hee hee hee   
Brandioch Conner
Jun 5, 2002, 15:04:19
 
heh... This would explain the exploits i ...   security through obscurity   
codez
Jun 5, 2002, 15:18:10
 
Oh! I forgot. We are not surprised in th ...   And we are surprised because........??   
Nicholas Donovan
Jun 5, 2002, 15:30:09
 
Even if (and that's a big if) closed ...   Missed a big point!   
Simon Hill
Jun 5, 2002, 15:35:47
 
This is from the article:"...A Microsoft ...   MS's Public Policy Agenda?   
is
Jun 5, 2002, 15:38:21
 
"Since malicious hackers cannot view the ...   Science fiction   
Shamar
Jun 5, 2002, 15:56:19
 
Ah, another "Mindcraft study". I'm a ...   Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Jonathan M. Prigot
Jun 5, 2002, 15:56:20
 
We knew this was true.  Not often the ac ...   Glee!   
Rufus Polson
Jun 5, 2002, 16:22:01
 
> What other "public policy agenda and i ...   Re: MS's Public Policy Agenda?   
Josh
Jun 5, 2002, 16:33:00
 
The thing that Open-Source code does for ...   But whose security?   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Jun 5, 2002, 16:33:40
 
> Ah, another "Mindcraft study". I'm ...   Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Rufus Polson
Jun 5, 2002, 16:35:05
 
Funny, the NSA is using linux as the bas ...   NSA   
PJ
Jun 5, 2002, 16:38:03
 
> and un-biased such a secret?? It's ...   Re: why is something independant   
Svartalf
Jun 5, 2002, 16:38:04
 
> "Never ascribe to malice what can be e ...   Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Larry
Jun 5, 2002, 16:39:56
 
I think what the Think Tank was saying i ...   It's not such a big deal...   
grytpype
Jun 5, 2002, 16:45:02
 
Does it takes a rocker scientist to figu ...   Did MS Pay for Open-Source Scare?   
Dom
Jun 5, 2002, 16:48:47
 
By chance I came across an article that  ...   corrupt practices   
Craig Nelson
Jun 5, 2002, 16:57:29
 
> Ah, another "Mindcraft study". I'm ...   Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
is
Jun 5, 2002, 17:00:11
 
> Ah, another "Mindcraft study". I'm ...   Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Anon
Jun 5, 2002, 17:02:08
 
> heh... This would explain the exploits ...   Re: security through obscurity   
Nicholas Donovan
Jun 5, 2002, 17:18:28
 
> Ah, another "Mindcraft study". I'm ...   Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Uno Engborg
Jun 5, 2002, 17:27:15
 
All I have to do is look at my Apache lo ...   ROFLMAO!   
Rick Ellis
Jun 5, 2002, 19:01:00
 
While having the source code may provide ...   security through obscurity ... NOT   
Kenneth Scharf
Jun 5, 2002, 19:07:31
 
> These practises of systematically misl ...   Re: Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Jeff
Jun 5, 2002, 19:17:40
 
 EWeek article   quotes by a "senior Mic ...   here is there security   
yuri vil
Jun 5, 2002, 20:30:34
 
The article refers to several reports wh ...   Published reports?   
Paul Taylor
Jun 5, 2002, 23:08:06
 
....of numerous well known, respected ne ...   According to the EDITORS, actually,...   
Bernard Swiss
Jun 6, 2002, 01:25:04
 
> > What other "public policy agenda and ...   Re: Re: MS's Public Policy Agenda?   
Phillip Brown
Jun 6, 2002, 01:56:36
 
"Microsoft has held the position that se ...   Couldn't agree more!   
Bojan Smojver
Jun 6, 2002, 02:15:29
 
> This is the usual tactics of the softw ...   Re: And we are surprised because........??   
R.L.
Jun 6, 2002, 04:12:35
 
These practises of systematically mislea ...   Re: Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
MartinV
Jun 6, 2002, 05:38:20
 
Slightly off-topic, but not that much    ...   Apropos Microsoft's representation of *reality   
R.L.
Jun 6, 2002, 06:00:51
 
> ...publishing your source code makes a ...   Re: It's not such a big deal...(yes, it is)   
Bill
Jun 6, 2002, 06:28:32
 
 Stop whining Microsoft, like MANY other ...   I don't see the problem here   
Frank V. Castellucci
Jun 6, 2002, 10:11:28
 
>  Stop whining > Microsoft, like MANY o ...   Re: I don't see the problem here   
Rufus Polson
Jun 6, 2002, 18:51:50
 
> > > These practises of systematically  ...   Re: Re: Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
Bernard Swiss
Jun 6, 2002, 20:19:52
 
Every time I read the 'security thro ...   Just plain wrong   
Joe User
Jun 7, 2002, 00:31:29
 
These practises of systematically mislea ...   Re: Re: Mindcraft, The Sequel   
kegwasher
Jun 7, 2002, 07:06:14
 
> >  Stop whining > > Microsoft, like MA ...   Re: Re: I don't see the problem here   
Frank V. Castellucci
Jun 7, 2002, 10:03:02
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs