Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3

60 Fantastic Free Android Apps

Ready for Another Linux Tablet? Meet the Rugged Trimble Yuma



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:CNET News: Decrypting the Secret to Strong Security
CNET News: Decrypting the Secret to Strong Security
Jan 17, 2003, 08 :30 UTC (9 Talkback[s]) (5946 reads)

(Other stories by Whitfield Diffie)

"The open-source movement argues that it's better because 'lots of eyes can look at it and find the bugs.' Those who favor proprietary software offer two counterarguments: The first is that a lot of hostile eyes can also look at open-source code--which, they say, is likely to benefit attackers more than anyone else. The second point is that a few expert eyes are better than several random ones; a dedicated organization with responsibility for the software is a better custodian than the many eyes of the open-source community.

"There is probably some truth to the notion that giving programmers access to a piece of software doesn't guarantee they will study it carefully. But there is a group of programmers who can be expected to care deeply: Those who either use the software personally or work for an enterprise that depends on it...."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
InternetWeek: Report Rekindles Open Source vs. Microsoft Security Debate(Nov 23, 2002)
Vnunet.com: Honeymoon Over for Linux Users(Sep 30, 2002)
ZDNet: Which Is More Secure? -- Open Source Vs. Proprietary(Jul 17, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Besides being able to fix security holes ...   Very true   
SM
Jan 17, 2003, 09:00:26
 
This lured them into a false sense of co ...   Re: Very true   
Wol
Jan 17, 2003, 13:04:32
 
Good security mechanisms can be analyzed ...   Good security mechanisms   
phil
Jan 17, 2003, 14:05:45
 
> Besides being able to fix security hol ...   Re: Very true   
Fred
Jan 17, 2003, 17:11:12
 
Actually it was more of not keeping up t ...   Re: Re: Very true   
SM
Jan 17, 2003, 21:18:50
 
One other thing, the battle of Midway wa ...   Re: Re: Very true (re. Mitsubishi Zero vs Grumman   
SM
Jan 17, 2003, 22:32:09
 
but at the time of Midway, if the Japane ...   Re: Re: Re: Very true (re. Mitsubishi Zero vs Grum   
Ron Johnson
Jan 18, 2003, 10:26:15
 
Had the Germans and the Japanese taken s ...   Re: Re: Re: Very true   
Wol
Jan 20, 2003, 08:41:25
 
- Jap planes all on deck, full of fuel & ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Very true (re. Mitsubishi Zero vs   
Wol
Jan 20, 2003, 08:45:41
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP