Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security

How to read a CSV file in Perl?

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy
Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy
Apr 19, 2004, 14 :00 UTC (26 Talkback[s]) (11275 reads)

(Other stories by Dan O’Dowd)

[ Thanks to Jason Greenwood for this link. ]

"Over the last few days, I have received many objections to my warning at the NetCentric Operations Conference that Linux is not secure enough to be used in defense systems. Most of the objections are based on a series of common misconceptions. To avoid unnecessary duplication and to approach this subject rationally, it is necessary to examine these misconceptions systematically. This is part I of a series of articles that will be published over the next few weeks to address these issues.

"Just because Linux is good for general purpose desktop computing and servers, for which it was designed, does not mean it is good for everything. Don't be someone who owns only a hammer, to whom everything looks like a nail. If you keep an open mind, I will show you why Linux is inappropriate for defense systems, and what kind of operating system should be used for defense systems..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Groklaw: CEO's of LynuxWorks and FSMLabs Reply to Green Hills' FUD(Apr 12, 2004)
BusinessWire: Using Linux Software in Defense Systems Violates Every Principle of Security...(Apr 09, 2004)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Only his OS is up to the job apparently. ...   advertising   
Mal
Apr 19, 2004, 14:22:50
 
Integrity is the best, better than the r ...   Bloody advertisement. Not worth reading.   
kelaklub
Apr 19, 2004, 14:28:01
 
It is a blatant plug for their product,  ...   It's a plug for their product, but he has a po   
Dave
Apr 19, 2004, 14:31:40
 
"Linux should not be allowed to run any  ...   Fair statement   
acyberpunk
Apr 19, 2004, 14:35:17
 
with an EAL 7, I would agree  ...   Re: advertising   
chris
Apr 19, 2004, 14:42:57
 
If you have to read O'Dowd's Win ...   Is EAL4 really any big deal?   
Frank
Apr 19, 2004, 14:46:10
 
The feedback the guy got to the first ar ...   Changed perspective   
mikeTA
Apr 19, 2004, 14:48:32
 
EAL4 is a big deal for just the reason f ...   EAL4 and EAL7points   
Evan
Apr 19, 2004, 14:53:44
 
The author is clearly agitated at a loss ...   Agitated   
saber850
Apr 19, 2004, 15:09:26
 
This gentleman has obviously spent much  ...   Glad he spent so much thought on the matter   
Rupert Fiennes
Apr 19, 2004, 15:19:32
 
I have no argument with the author that  ...   Military Motives   
Joe Almeida
Apr 19, 2004, 15:39:59
 
You know what great is that industries h ...   You know what great is ...   
OMG
Apr 19, 2004, 16:03:30
 
At least, he is right to a small degree. ...   He is Right!   
Padma
Apr 19, 2004, 16:11:51
 
What company, in their right mind, would ...   He had valid points.   
Scott Howell
Apr 19, 2004, 16:15:53
 
In the case of our INTEGRITY-178B operat ...   my 2.231 cents   
Keith
Apr 19, 2004, 16:29:40
 
I think the important thing to note here ...   re: is EAL4 really any big deal?   
bonehead
Apr 19, 2004, 16:34:21
 
> It is a blatant plug for their product ...   Re: It's a plug for their product, but he has   
Svartalf
Apr 19, 2004, 17:23:34
 
#1...Over the last few days, I have rece ...   By the numbers.   
Brandioch Conner
Apr 19, 2004, 17:23:54
 
> What the military may be looking at is ...   Re: Military Motives   
Svartalf
Apr 19, 2004, 17:28:44
 
When was the last time a plane went down ...   Re: You know what great is ...   
Vance
Apr 19, 2004, 17:45:28
 
> with an EAL 7, I would agree Consideri ...   Re: Re: advertising   
Svartalf
Apr 19, 2004, 17:55:19
 
could not continue past a few lines. (Or ...   My God, which bad stuff ..   
R.L.
Apr 19, 2004, 17:55:21
 
> You might recall a little problem we h ...   Re: Re: You know what great is ...   
OMG
Apr 19, 2004, 18:27:59
 
The original article quoted O'Dowd m ...   Clarification suggestions   
anthony
Apr 19, 2004, 19:22:03
 
I don't think the person who keeps b ...   Whatever   
NeoSadist
Apr 20, 2004, 02:33:54
 
Your wrong ... go read https://reports.e ...   Re: Re: You know what great is ...   
Vance
Apr 21, 2004, 19:19:53
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP