Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?

Creating Ebooks with Sigil

Editor's Note: Making Multi-Channel Firewire Music With Linux

Amaya: A Simple, Yet Useful Alternative to Dreamweaver




Server Support Specialist I
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-OK-Oklahoma City

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy, Part III
Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy, Part III
May 3, 2004, 22 :00 UTC (24 Talkback[s]) (7336 reads)

(Other stories by Dan O’Dowd)

"Many people grudgingly accept the fact that Linux security is not good enough for critical defense systems today. But they cling to the misconception that the open source development process is so superior to any proprietary development process that in the fullness of time, Linux security will improve until it is as good as any 'proprietary' operating system. But Linux's security problems can't be fixed, they are systemic and long standing. There is no way to fix Linux to bring it up to the level of security that is required for national defense systems, a level that is already available in proprietary operating systems..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
The Age: Open Source Group Hits Out at Back-Door Claims(May 03, 2004)
Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy, Part II(Apr 26, 2004)
Green Hills: Linux Security Controversy(Apr 19, 2004)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Windows and many commerical software pro ...   Speed is good, too   
Sean
May 3, 2004, 22:21:00
 
Gasping for air to utter agitated and de ...   Boring Rant   
GaAsP
May 3, 2004, 22:31:13
 
Green Hills only Controversy is their lo ...   Stupid self-Controversy   
GH
May 3, 2004, 22:36:20
 
Hmm, IMHO, Dan O'Dowd seems to be au ...   Will Green Hills be the next SCO?   
Jonathan M. Prigot
May 3, 2004, 23:05:21
 
I don't know much about security, re ...   He doesn't understand the GPL--are there other   
Elijah Newren
May 3, 2004, 23:12:52
 
Yawn.  We've heard this sillines bef ...   Yawn   
Kenneth Jennings
May 3, 2004, 23:14:09
 
I don't know about this icat.nist.go ...   icat metabase, security through secrecy   
Andy
May 3, 2004, 23:44:48
 
I am not a linux guru or genius.  In fac ...   Ok, let's discuss this   
NeoSadist
May 3, 2004, 23:47:46
 
...of a defender of proprietary software ...   Cries of anguish...   
Mario Miyojim
May 3, 2004, 23:59:41
 
I think I may have discovered why there& ...   Oh, I think I know why now...   
NeoSadist
May 4, 2004, 00:06:12
 
more anti-linux FUD.-SuSE made level 3 c ...   slanted, as usual   
Joe Zasada
May 4, 2004, 00:43:20
 
First he argues that making the source c ...   He wants to have it both ways...   
Jay Curry
May 4, 2004, 01:22:53
 
In the Navy, we had a saying regarding p ...   Scared   
Gomer Simson
May 4, 2004, 01:28:14
 
Security was not a focus of the original ...   Unix and GNU/Linux: Single User Systems   
horne
May 4, 2004, 01:56:19
 
"Security was not a focus of the origina ...   Unix a single user system ?   
Khan Md Ashraf
May 4, 2004, 02:11:00
 
The guy is tranparently trying to FUD hi ...   Why are you feeding ODowd's trolling?   
Commentor
May 4, 2004, 03:05:59
 
 ... Security was not a focus of the ori ...   How's this for clueless?   
Kenneth Jennings
May 4, 2004, 03:16:15
 
http://www.reasoning.com/newsevents/pr/0 ...   Real Data on Linux   
Andrew Kornak
May 4, 2004, 05:26:39
 
I wonder if he really believes what he w ...   this guy is so silly   
myname
May 4, 2004, 07:43:01
 
From their web site:"The next Linux Secu ...   Advertizing disguised as "white papers"   
Kenneth Jennings
May 4, 2004, 12:41:40
 
You can't hack a machine that isn&#3 ...   BSOD gives the best security   
Toblemo
May 4, 2004, 22:30:16
 
I'm not sure how to interpret the wa ...   I looked at the ICAT site   
Toblemo
May 5, 2004, 00:00:32
 
If a network operating system cannot be  ...   Re: Unix a single user system ?   
hs
May 5, 2004, 01:24:18
 
In their article titled "FUD in a basket ...   Mad Penguin shot this guy in the foot :)   
TrialOfFire
May 5, 2004, 06:56:14
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs