OSNews Asks: Who'd Be Responsible for a Linux Conficker?
Apr 16, 2009, 17:32 (8 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Thom Holwerda)
"A Linux distribution is made up of various components written
by lots of different projects. Those projects, in turn, are
comprised of lots of individuals who contribute code in a loose
manner. Microsoft Windows is also made up of various different
components, written by several different departments ("projects",
if you will) within Microsoft. These projects, in turn, are also
comprised of several different people.
"If you can blame "Microsoft" for the Conficker worm, then who
do you blame when it comes to a Linux distribution?"
- New Attack Sneaks Rootkits Into Linux Kernel(Apr 15, 2009)
- The slow brute zombies are back(Apr 14, 2009)
- Conficker Twitch Leaves Security Sleuths With More Mysteries to Solve(Apr 10, 2009)
- Electricity Grid in U.S. Penetrated By Spies(Apr 09, 2009)
Groups Warn New Cybersecurity Bill Oversteps(Apr 08, 2009)
- Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable,
And Total Failure of Information Security(Apr 03, 2009)
- 53 Pages, 10 Months, 1295 Infected Hosts, 103 Countries, And They Still Can't Say "Windows Malware"(Mar 31, 2009)
- 100% cure for Conficker(Mar 30, 2009)
- Worm targets Linux routers(Mar 26, 2009)
- But I didn't get your e-mail!(Mar 21, 2009)
- Essential Linux tools for the PC technician(Mar 16, 2009)