LinuxPlanet: .comment: 86ing XFree?
Dec 13, 2000, 13:53 (56 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Dennis E. Powell)
Desktop-as-a-Service Designed for Any Cloud ? Nutanix Frame
"Can we agree that XFree86 has become a mess?"
"If you don't, download the current CVS tree and try to make
some sense of it. Or, if your connection is such that you really
can't spare a couple of days to get it, download the source for
XFree86-4.01 and take a look. For an extra-special good time, try
building it with direct rendering (DRI) support and a kernel module
for your 3-D video card. See what I mean?
"XFree can be built. I've done it several times. Because it
relies on the hoary old imake, it requires skills otherwise long
dormant, or acquisition of new skills that are unlikely to be of
use anywhere else. The compilation produces -- or comes to a halt
because it cannot produce -- all sorts of stuff that it is
guaranteed you do not need. The resulting binaries can conflict
with whatever is already on your machine such that it can lock
solid -- I've encountered this with dueling GL libraries -- and
sorting it all out is mind-bogglingly difficult."
"What's more, the current XFree86 configuration tools are just
awful. There is no longer an XF86Setup. The old, console-based
standby, xf86config, fails to recognize a lot of modern hardware:
We now have video cards with lots of memory, and we have monitors
manufactured in the last few years that are -- surprise! --
different from the ones built earlier. There is a new configuration
tool that I have yet to see produce a useful XF86Config file on any