ZDNet: Their gain, your pain - "Open licensing" schemes are nothing of the sort
Dec 22, 2000, 19:58 (6 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Evan Leibovitch)
Desktop-as-a-Service Designed for Any Cloud ? Nutanix Frame
"The Unix wars of the last decade pretty well blew the word
"open" into uselessness, but I'm still intrigued by the way it has
been turned upside down yet again in one sad little corner of the
"I'm referring to the Microsoft Open License Program. Of course,
Microsoft isn't alone in the misappropriation: Adobe calls it Open
Options; Computer Associates and others also have "Open Licensing"
"So what is an "open license"? The term apparently evolved from
what most folks refer to as volume purchasing: buying software
licenses in bulk without the extra boxes and CD-ROMs. With an open
license, instead of all that packaging, all you need to keep track
of are license numbers or unlocking keycodes - and those can even
be delivered by e-mail."
"Is it environmentally friendly? Sure. Is it cost-effective? Not
as much as it should be."
"Is it open? Heck, no."
- eWeek: Microsoft roils the waters with licensing changes; Windows customers looking closer at Linux(Dec 22, 2000)
- The Register: MS reimaging sting will cost business $11bn - Gartner(Sep 27, 2000)
- CRN: Licensing Policy in Question -- Microsoft Select customers to pay more for Windows deployment(Aug 23, 2000)
- Gartner: Microsoft Uses Windows License Compliance Confusion to Drive New Revenue(Aug 13, 2000)
- The Register: High prices, false steps help Windows lose to Linux in China(Aug 08, 2000)
- Excite/ZDNet: Microsoft to hike price of server apps(Jun 17, 2000)
- Silicon.com: Gartner stresses costs of Win2000 migration(Feb 22, 2000)
- GartnerGroup: The Higher Licensing Cost of Upgrading to Windows 2000(Feb 20, 2000)
- ZDNet/Reuters: GartnerGroup: MS to charge firms extra [for Win2k](Feb 18, 2000)