Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.

More on LinuxToday

Python-dev summary, January 1-15, 2001

Jan 19, 2001, 19:39 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by A.M. Kuchling)


How to Help Your Business Become an AI Early Adopter

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:01 -0500
From: A.M. Kuchling akuchlin@mems-exchange.org
To: python-announce@python.org
Subject: python-dev summary, Jan. 1-15

Python-dev summary, January 1-15, 2001

To comment on material in this python-dev summary, you can simply post to comp.lang.python / . These summaries are archived at

Heading for 2.1alpha1

The pace of checkins has been steadily increasing in preparation for the release of the first alpha of Python 2.1, still scheduled for Friday, January 19 (but don't be surprised if it's a few days late).

The following PEPs had their implementations committed: PEP 208, "Reworking the Coercion Model"; PEP 230, "Warning Framework"; PEP 232, "Function Attributes". PEP 222, "Web Library Enhancements", has been abandoned, or at least deferred to some future Python release.

Speeding up file.readline()

Improving the speed of line-by-line file access generated the most discussion during this period.

New users wanting to compare Python and Perl often try the benchmark of writing simple loops in both languages to read all the lines in the file. Python 2.0 comes out slower in this test, but no one had ever looked into the cause. As a datapoint, Tim Peters measured a "while 1: line = file.readline()" loop at 30 seconds on Windows, while a Perl loop took 6 seconds, for a factor of 7 difference; the numbers are somewhat better on most Unix machines, but Python is still consistently slower.

This benchmark came up for discussion in comp.lang.python. The python-dev discussion started with a patch submitted by Jeff Epler that added an xreadlines() function, analogous to xrange(), so you could write "for line in file.xreadlines(): ...". "The desire is to iterate over file contents in a way that satisfies the following criteria: * Uses the 'for' syntax, because this clearly captures the underlying operation. (files can be viewed as sequences of lines when appropriate) * Consumes small amounts of memory even when the file contents are large. * Has the lowest overhead that can reasonably be attained."

Many false paths were followed in the resulting lengthy threads. I don't propose to summarize every single red herring, but will instead jump right to the conclusions.

The loop inside Python's readline() function is a straightforward while loop using getc(). In multithreaded environments, getc() has to lock the file object, and this adds additional overhead. On Windows the overhead is startling: "It looks like we're paying (on Win98SE) approximately:

   17 seconds for compiling with _MT (threadsafe libc)
    6 seconds to do the work 
    5 seconds for "other stuff", best guess mostly a poor
          platform malloc/realloc
    2 seconds for not optimizing the loop
   30 total"
Perl is fast because it accesses the internals of C's FILE objects, accessing the stream's buffers directly. The problem is that this is nonportable and, as Tim Peters discovered, complicated: "20 years ago I may have thought this was fun. I thought debugging large systems of m4 macros was fun then, and I'm not sure this is either better or worse than that -- well, it's worse, because I understood m4's implementation."

Windows has very high locking overhead for some reason, but this overhead is still present on Unix platforms. The Single Unix Specification includes a getc_unlocked() function that does no locking and saves this overhead; the flockfile() and funlockfile() functions can be used to lock the stream outside of an inner loop. Most Unix platforms seem to gain an improvement of a factor of 4 or so, but Mark Favas reported an extreme value: Tru64, the simple while loop went from 322 seconds to 10 seconds, a factor of 32.

Windows doesn't have a getc_unlocked(), so a different solution needs to be used there. Tim came up with a scheme using fgets(); fgets on its own isn't suitable for reading lines, because there's no way to detect embedded nulls, but you can fill a buffer with non-null bytes, read a line into the buffer, and then search from the left for a newline. "Surprise? Despite all the memsets, memchrs (looking for a newline), and one-at-a-time backward searches (looking for a null byte), it's a huge win on Windows." The simple while loop went from 30 seconds to 13 seconds.

Some improvements were also made to the fileinput module, and Jeff Epler's xreadlines module was added, with the right glue to add an .xreadlines() method to file objects that automatically imports the module. 'for line in file.xreadlines()' usually takes about half the time of the simple while loop.

Therefore, Python 2.1 will have significantly faster file I/O for the common task of processing a file line-by-line.


Ka-Ping Yee announced pydoc, a tool for browsing the python documentation: "At the shell prompt, 'pydoc ' displays documentation on , very much like 'man'." ?!ng posted a sample transcript of pydoc in action:

It's been checked into the sandbox area of the CVS tree:

Try it out! The more favorable reaction to pydoc and the more testing it gets, the better the chance of it slipping into 2.1.

Exporting names from a module

Patch #102808 adds a mechanism to export names from a module. GvR's description: "... if there's a variable __exports__ in the module, it is a list of identifiers, and any access from outside the module to names not in the list is disallowed. This affects access using the getattr and setattr protocols (which raise AttributeError for disallowed names), as well as "from M import v" (which raises ImportError)."

Reactions were mixed. Some people liked the idea, and thought it would make some additional optimizations possible. To quote Neil Schemenauer, "It should allow some attribute access inside of modules to become faster (like LOAD_FAST for locals). I think that optimization could be implemented without too much difficulty." Other people thought that applying it only to modules would cause people to assume that it would also work for classes, but the patch didn't implement that.

The final decision was to reject the patch. However, one part of the patch was added; 'from Module import *' will now look for a variable named __all__ containing a list of strings, and will only import the symbols listed in __all__.

Other things

Christian Tismer released a set of Stackless Python patches for 2.0. Note that a bugfix release was made on January 15th.
Michel Pelletier has written a draft PEP for adding interfaces to Python. No PEP number has been allocated yet.

Related Links

Python-dev archives:

Python project page on SourceForge:

Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs):