"No matter how often it has been said, it seems that many
GNU/Linux and Macintosh users refuse to see the obvious. The
response to a recent article of mine demonstrated this statement as
well as any other example I can think of. What is so obvious? That
while speciality software and functionality is nice, it isn't going
to make or break adoption of an operating system.
It all started at the beginning of this month, when I published
the article Mac OS X: An Apple a Day keeps the Penguins
Away?, which clearly noted that in every area, GNU/Linux was
nearly as good, as good, or even better than Mac OS X for the
average user. I was not surprised that my mail box was flooded with
dissenting opinions, particularly from Mac users, however something
did surprise me--the supposed reasons I was being given for Mac OS
X being better than GNU/Linux did not even make sense in the
context of my article.
"I expected to be told about how easy it was to use Mac OS X, or
how much better the software was. Instead, the majority of
'reasons' I was given were focused on specialty applications such
as Photoshop and Final Cut. One person asked me something to the
effect of 'tell me where I can get Quark Xpress for Linux...'"