"I don't understand, what exactly is a pain about it? (I can't tell why a new
one is better if you don't say what you're objecting to about the old one...)
> Benefits of this is it more accuratly represents to people just how old
> the kernel they are currently running is (2.6.9 would be have been
> 2004.9.0 on this naming scheme.)
Benefits is plural, but I seem to have missed the other ones. Or is that the
only issue, wanting to put a more prominent "best if used by" date in the
name ala Windows 95?"
