"I don't understand, what exactly is a pain about it? (I can't tell why a new
one is better if you don't say what you're objecting to about the old one...)
> Benefits of this is it more accuratly represents to people just how old
> the kernel they are currently running is (2.6.9 would be have been
> 2004.9.0 on this naming scheme.)
Benefits is plural, but I seem to have missed the other ones. Or is that the
only issue, wanting to put a more prominent "best if used by" date in the
name ala Windows 95?"
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.