Linux: Drivers Should NOT be Closed Source
Apr 20, 2009, 04:02 (0 Talkback[s])
No-Size-Fits-All! An Application-Down Approach for Your Cloud Transformation REGISTER >
"I'll try and address all of the issues that came up in the
discussion, and then if those who's comments I have removed for
being OT from the previous article want to discuss further, they
can on this entry.
"Hardware Manufacturers Need Trade Secretes for their drivers -
False, hardware is not sold because the software is good, it's sold
because the hardware is good. The loss in effectiveness and quality
that a manufacturer will suffer from keeping everything in house
will be massive as the amount of possible peer review and reuse of
other modular parts is small.
The Musings blog above states that "where some zealots believe
that people who make money selling software are somehow evil.":
Firstly hardware makers make money selling hardware, not software.
Secondly, the GPL has no issues with people making money from
selling software, it's concern is with the reciprocal freedom you
must grant to all users. There may be some reorganisation that's
required in order to make money effectively but none of these
issues effect hardware manufacturers."
- Linux Works Even When Your PC is Committing Suicide(Apr 15, 2009)
- 5 Most important companies to the advancment of enterprise GNU/Linux(Apr 06, 2009)
- The key to Linux's mainstream success(Apr 04, 2009)
- Linux game console ready to ship(Apr 03, 2009)
- Testing Out The Nouveau Driver On Fedora 11(Mar 31, 2009)
- 3D Graphics hardware performance using Free Software drivers (X.Org DRI)(Mar 31, 2009)
- AMD Catalyst 9.3 Brings OpenGL Composite Support(Mar 27, 2009)
- Linux distro Moblin V2 alpha 2 released(Mar 25, 2009)
- Debian and keyboard mapping copyrights(Mar 19, 2009)
- Proprietary Driver for Ubuntu 9.04: Fglrx for X Server 1.6(Mar 19, 2009)
- Converting xorg.conf settings to fdi policy files(Mar 19, 2009)