The LibDave method of patent immunity
Jul 07, 2009, 14:04 (2 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Steve Lake)
WEBINAR:
On-Demand
Re-Imagining Linux Platforms to Meet the Needs of Cloud Service Providers
[ Thanks to An Anonymous Reader for
this link. ]
"No need for legislation, no need for lawyers. If I
were a coder on a, say Linux, project and M$ accused me of using
'patented' code, I would create an negative averment affidavit,
something along the lines of:
"I see no evidence that M$ has any patentable code and I do not
believe that any exists.
"Sign it and send it to the M$ registered agent (at least one in
Washington (I'm not sure if it needs one in each state were it does
business)) under notary seal, and give it 3 days to
respond/refute."
Complete Story
Related Stories:
- Fedora: A Hat with a History(Jun 30, 2009)
- Stop Ragging on KDE4!(Jun 20, 2009)
- Exploring Freebsd 7.2 - Part 2 - Security and Setup(Jun 16, 2009)
- Battleground Firefox: The Extension Wars(Jun 09, 2009)
- Review: PC/OS 2009v2a(Jun 04, 2009)
- Another Simple Way to End the Patent Threat: Monetary Punishment and Rewards(May 29, 2009)
- How To Install Arch Linux Via FTP(May 20, 2009)
- Linux, FOSS and the Cellular Empire(May 19, 2009)
- Review: Linux Mint 6 KDE(May 09, 2009)
- Mini HOWTO: Tiny Core Linux 1.4 LiveUSB home web server(May 01, 2009)
