Open Source Landmark: Mono Freed at Last?
Jul 09, 2009, 01:33 (11 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Bruce Byfield)
WEBINAR: On-demand webcast
How to Boost Database Development Productivity on Linux, Docker, and Kubernetes with Microsoft SQL Server 2017 REGISTER >
"The move was greeted with excitement by Mono developers and
distributors, but others are treating the news with caution and
waiting for detailed legal opinions.
"The debate over Mono has been complicated by accusations and
irrelevancies on both sides. However, the main issue in the debate
has always been the parts of the .NET Framework used by Mono that
fall under ECMA standards covered by patents.
"These parts include the form and interpretation of C#, which is
covered by ECMA 334 specifications, and the Common Language
Infrastructure, which is covered by ECMA 335 specifications.
"Neither parts of .NET not implemented in Mono, such as ADO.NET,
ASP.NET and Windows.Forms, nor libraries developed by Mono
specifically for GNU/Linux, have ever been affected by these or any
other patents, according to Mono's Licensing FAQ. However, the
affected parts have been more than enough for sections of the free
software community to reject Mono, or at least to treat it
- Stop piling on Mono already(Jul 08, 2009)
- Mono promise is nice, Microsoft. What about Linux?(Jul 07, 2009)
- New CAOS report on open source licenses, uses(Jul 07, 2009)
- Use Gnome-Do To Control Rhythmbox, Banshee, Exaile and XMMS2(Jul 07, 2009)
- Microsoft appears to clarify Mono licensing(Jul 07, 2009)
- Miguel: You, the man! - Open letter to Miguel de Icaza(Jul 06, 2009)
- Correction regarding the "tomboy / mono in default installation" thingy(Jul 06, 2009)
Are Contentious Debates Derailing FOSS?(Jul 06, 2009)
- Identifying and removing Microsoft patented ideas from Linux: A Patent A Day Project(Jul 06, 2009)
- Hands off the Gimp(Jul 04, 2009)