"The Free Software Foundation likes to talk about free software
in â€œethicalâ€ terms, claiming that
users should have a fundamental right to the
â€œfour freedomsâ€ in all software
(i.e. that proprietary software shouldnâ€™t
"This is the strong claim for free software. But as an ethical
claim, itâ€™s predicated on the assumption that
free software can fill the niches that proprietary software does
(although you wouldnâ€™t guess that from most of
the rhetoric that has been published).
"If it canâ€™t, then eliminating proprietary
software deprives users of fundamental functionality. You have no
freedom in software that doesnâ€™t exist. As
such, if the software cannot be written as free software (e.g.
because the business model is just too thin and no one wants to
volunteer), then losing the proprietary alternative represents a
net loss of end user freedom."
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.