"The OpenSSL license, which is BSD-style with an advertising
clause, has been a source of problems in the past because it is
rather unclear whether projects using it can also include
GPL-licensed code. Most distributions seem to be comfortable that
OpenSSL can be considered a "system library", so that linking to it
does not require OpenSSL to have a GPL-compatible license, but the
Free Software Foundation (FSF) and, unsurprisingly, Debian are not
on board with that interpretation. This licensing issue recently
reared its head again in a thread on the pgsql-hackers (PostgreSQL
development) mailing list.
"For command-line-oriented programs, the GNU readline library,
which allows various types for command-line editing, is a common
addition. But readline is licensed under the GPL (rather than the
LGPL), which means that programs which use it must have a
compatible license and PostgreSQL's BSD-ish permissive license
certainly qualifies. But the OpenSSL license puts additional
restrictions on its users and is thus not compatible with the GPL.
Whether that is a real problem in practice depends on how you
interpret the GPL and whether OpenSSL qualifies for the system
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.