Red Hat-Microsoft Agreement Not Malicious, But Was It Smart?

Feb 16, 2009, 23:06 (14 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Roy Schestowitz)

"It also appears possible, having not seen the pertinent details, that Red Hat will benefit if its newly-/recently-acquired KVM technology, for example, can virtualise Windows well. This would help marketing of RHEL and Linux in general (with KVM 'baked in').

"On the other bright side, if Hyper-V becomes not a SLES-only area for decent performance, then companies will be less inclined to purchase vouchers from Microsoft/Novell (Microsoft openly calls these "patent royalties" now).

"Hasn't Red Hat distanced itself from Xen somewhat, for obvious reasons [1, 2]? It's partly because of Microsoft's malicious, self-serving strategy around hypervisors. They hoard the market using partners and allies, but they cannot swallow the entire ocean."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Red Hat & Microsoft partner up!(Feb 17, 2009)
• Australian University Migrates IT Systems to Red Hat Solutions(Jan 29, 2009)
• Open Source: An Open Question for Red Hat and Others(Aug 20, 2008)
• $332 Million (Or More) Awaits Red Hat Partners(Jul 11, 2008)
• Red Hat Linux in Professional Portal Push(Oct 11, 2007)