Linux.com: Open Source vs. Commercial Software Development
Dec 03, 2000, 19:18 (5 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Grant Robertson)
How to Help Your Business Become an AI Early Adopter
"Deadlines can be good. I've seen amazing things happen under
the pressure of an unrealistic deadline. I've seen software that
couldn't make it half way through Q&A without causing testers
to become physically ill. Suddenly and miraculously, the software
would make an acceptable, if painful, trip through the cycle.
Excessively long days by dedicated developers can make such
miracles happen. Those developers usually expect a reward of some
sort at the end. Often, they remain empty handed."
"Under the philosophies of open source development, things like
this rarely happen. There are no real Q&A cycles, although we
have the largest quality assurance team ever recorded. We arguably
turn out quality software in less time than ever thought possible.
We achieve this with only dedication and a desire to see software
that works. There is no pressure to go public, or attract
investors. There is no reason to prematurely give something a 1.0
or even 2.0 moniker. There is no reason to include features that
don't make sense. Corporate civilization frets over the thing that
makes us great: we simply don't care."
"We don't care if our software is still somewhere south of 1.0.
Enlightenment, arguably one of the most beautiful pieces of open
source software, is still in 0.16. While far away from a 1.0
release, it's more stable, feature rich and usable than many
commercial products. Enlightenment's age and the fact it hadn't
been through a 1.0 release and wasn't available in retail would be
considered a dismal failure. The product development manager would
be summarily shot by the CEO whose fortune would have rapidly
depleted as investors jumped ship like rats from the Titanic."
- LinuxProgramming.com: Managing Projects the Open Source Way(Nov 01, 2000)
- ZDNet: Should all software be open sourced?(Oct 26, 2000)
- StarOffice Code Released in Largest Open Source Project(Oct 13, 2000)
- Byte.com: GNashing KDE And Other Non-Trivial Pursuits - Closed vs. Open Source Stuff(Sep 18, 2000)
- Enhydra.org: Beg, Borrow, and Steal: Why Open Source is the only choice(Jul 22, 2000)
- Linux.com: Gated Communities(Jul 10, 2000)
- Technocrat.net: Is there a reason to -use- Open Source software?(Jul 02, 2000)
- Upside: Can we marry the open source and commercial worlds?(Jun 28, 2000)
- BeOpen.com: Games: The Boundary of Open Development?(Jun 28, 2000)
- Linux Magazine: Can A Pure Open Source Company Survive?(Jun 24, 2000)
- VNU Net: Gartner debunks open source myths(May 22, 2000)
- LinuxPlanet: Word to the Wise... Maxwell [Word Processor]: Moving to Open Source(May 03, 2000)