"Some enterprises jumped onto the open-source bandwagon because
they thought they would save money. The purchase price of Windows
2000 Server is a million times higher than the purchase price of
Linux, after all. Multiply that by a dozen servers-and slip a few
copies of Linux onto the desktop while you're at it-and the savings
add up. Or at least, that was the rationale."
"In retrospect, this justification for moving to open source
never made much sense. The purchase price of the operating system
must be the smallest part of the overall cost of installing and
operating an enterprise data system, dwarfed by training costs,
support costs, the cost of change and other factors. Every analyst
has a proprietary total-cost-of-ownership model, and everyone's
equation is slightly different. But they all show that the low cost
of acquiring free software is not a significant benefit when
amortized over the lifetime costs of the system."
"Open-source software may indeed save you a little bit of money.
But the savings isn't sufficient to justify the disruption and cost
of changing, nor to sustain the boom in open-source computing."
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.