Note that, headline aside, this isn't a "sky is falling" story.
Just an example of how the GPL interacts out there in the world
with a well-established body that has its own licensing practices
in place. Whether the GPL would be better for said organization or
not is something we're sure someone has an opinion on:
"A recent discussion on firstname.lastname@example.org highlights
ways in which the W3C's model of collaborative development is quite
different from some popular open source models.
While Curt Arnold was developing a set of XSLT transformations
as a framework for the test suite work (which is being done in
public), he concluded:
"I've been working under an assumption of good faith and have
been making stuff available with no explicit copyright or terms of
use. However, I'm starting to get a little uncomfortable with my
personal exposure by doing this. By asserting a copyright and GPL,
I at least cover myself by providing a standard liability
disclaimer. I'm still free to donate the code to the W3C, when and
if desired, to be released under an appropriate license."
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.