An interview with Microsoft Program manager Dave Stutz discusses
some of the issues behind .NET, shared source, and Microsoft's
preference for FreeBSD over Linux as a target platform for
implementing .NET for Unix-like operating systems because of
"Stutz: ...The licensing terms are
designed so that people who want to do non-commercial ports to
Linux [can do so]. That's well within the intended purpose of the
license. We don't feel comfortable with Linux because of the GPL
nature of the kernel ...
FreeBSD has traditionally been an operating system that
encouraged unencumbered experimentation. ... And that's what we're
using it for. We're using it to prove the point that you can
actually implement the CLI on Unix. It's been around a long time,
people use it commercially. Microsoft uses it commercially,
actually. And the academic community is quite familiar with it as
John Osborne: So you're favoring FreeBSD over
Linux because of the licensing?
Stutz: We have chosen FreeBSD because of
licensing issues, yes."
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.