Since everyone has a theory on why SCO is doing what they are
doing, I will instead talk about something else that has been
weighing on my mind for the past few weeks.
SuSE, of late, is constantly pigeon-holed as an "also-ran" in
the media. It is, and has been for quite sometime, perceived as the
"number two" Linux or "the other" Linux--second to Red Hat in many
ways. Even though it it clearly the dominant leader in Europe and
the undisputed king in its home nation of Germany, SuSE's weaker
showing in the North American market has relegated perceptions of
the company to "second best."
I think this perception is almost a mistake. "Almost" because
there are anecdotal stories I hear all the time about how SuSE's
dropped the ball in picking up a new customer or not handled some
company's tech support issues properly. The people who tell me
these tales are almost never angry--usually, they're befuddled as
to why a perfectly good company with a perfectly good product keeps
"Mistake" is the problem with perception that I would like to
address if I lived in a perfect world. I would argue that just
because a company does not succeed here in the United States does
not automatically make it second to anyone. SuSE knows how to be a
software company, and a successful one, and they should be judged
Alas, this is not a perfect world, and SuSE has indeed brought
some of this problem upon themselves. Over the past few years I
have watched a successful and vital company slowly fade into the
background while Red Hat tears through the market and IBM co-opts
an ideal that could have belonged to SuSE.
That ideal is the concept of Linux as an overall solution,
recently articulated by Progeny's Ian Murdock. IBM uses this
concept all of the time. They don't buy into a single distribution
of Linux--Big Blue sells Linux as a means to an end, and will use
whatever facets of Linux they can to deliver an effective solution
to their customer.
SuSE very nearly had this ideal in their grasp when Ransom Love
approached them a while back about the idea for a new, UnitedLinux.
UnitedLinux, despite whatever problems it had in its application,
was still a great idea: an almost vendor-neutral approach to Linux
that would not lead to vendor lock-in for customers.
Had UnitedLinux been executed properly, it would have been
SuSE's golden ticket to the North American market, while infusing
the entire Linux community with a good, strong dose of
Now, we have an almost non-existent UnitedLinux entity that is
for all intents and purposes, dead. Don't believe me? On August 5,
it was announced that IBM and SuSE had achieved Common Crtieria
certification from the US government. That's SUSE, not
Observers will quickly point to SCO's bizarre behavior as reason
for this demise, but I am not so willing to lay all the blame on
The SCO Group's feet. UnitedLinux had one foot in the grave long
before Darl McBride started leading his campaign against IBM,
Linux, and all things open source.
The last significant thing UnitedLinux did was on June 25, when
it introduced its ISV partnership program. "Significant" would be
their word for it. It was barely a blip on the radar for the rest
of us. The government certification story got a lot more attention,
but those accolades only go to SuSE, it seems.
So, here's my completely unsolicited advice for SuSE: make a
move. Any move. You are condemning yourselves to limbo with all of
your ambiguity. Is UnitedLinux alive? Then do something with it!
Kick SCO out, add new partners, sell UL-based and -logoed
Otherwise, drop UL like a bad habit and get on with something
else. The government certification is a good start. Follow up with
some certification of your own, like that cert project UL's
supposed to be working on with the Linux Professional
Your desktop offerings have always been strong: get in there and
tighten the desktop up and start marketing them hard to customers,
both corporate and private. Red Hat's moves away from their retail
offering leaves you a way to compete on grounds they're leaving
behind. And I know there's a whole slew of people out there that
would rather give you their money than to Sun for their Mad Hatter
I am sure smarter people than I will have better suggestions,
but you get the idea. SuSE needs to be up in the face of the IT
communities, selling their wares with gusto, not playing tag-along
with Red Hat.
There is some real truth in this advice for all of the
commercial Linux distributions, not just SuSE. Microsoft is
regrouping, UNIX is declining. What in heaven's name are all of you
Because as of now, Linux is rapidly being associated with Red
Hat alone. And lack of strong competition within any industry is
not good, not matter how cool the main player is.
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.