Quick poll: hands up if you at least chuckled at the news that
BayStar was going to pull out $20 million of their investment in
The SCO Group. Sure, I've got my hand up. As a sideline watcher of
the events surrounding the Linden, Utah company, I too thought it
was a huge dose of karma being laid down upon Darl and Co.
And how about this one: did today's news about the Royal Bank of
Canada's massive stock conversion tickle your fancy?
Okay, so how many thought it was funny when BayStar told us why
they were going to withdraw their investment? That they needed to
focus more on litigation and less on their software product
See, that's when I stopped laughing.
BayStar's demands, on the surface, may have seemed like
playground comeuppance--the kind you may have relished as a kid,
when you could say "Gee Butch, I don't think you'll be bothering me
any more. Meet my friend much taller and stronger friend Biff." The
playground bully, it seems, was getting bullyed themselves.
At the time, SCO immediately squawked and said they did not
agree with BayStar's demands--but they were continuing to
negotiate. Some in the community said that Darl's own ego would be
his downfall and they would never capitulate. The SCO stock
plummeted with the news, and many started polishing their best
dancing shoes to perform a jig on the grave of SCO.
But something has happened since the BayStar threat that really
raised my concern level.
Then SCO confirmed that it had made some layoffs recently. They
made this announcement quietly, which is a bit odd, because I know
some public companies can get a stock boost from those investors
that look at layoffs as just another cost-cutting move that will
(in pure business terms) improve the company's bottom line.
Still, given the amount of negative press the company has been
bombarded with over the last 15 months, one could hardly blame SCO
for keeping the layoffs quiet.
When the layoffs were announced, many people started lacing up
those grave-dancing shoes. But I would submit that anyone who
thinks that SCO is about to go to the great beyond should hold off
celebrating (or mourning, as the case may be).
Layoffs, for me, are never happy things to report. Even if I
dislike a company or what it stands for, it is always troublesome
that the people who do the majority of the day-to-day work at a
company are the first to get penalized for the decisions that the
corporate exectutives made in the first place. Executives who
rarely take paycuts to help save the company's bottom line, mind
And losing a job is always a stressful event, with chaos and
struggle that I really would not like to wish on anyone. So I hope
the employees laid off from SCO do well in their search for new
That said, I think the layoffs are a sign that SCO may indeed be
listening to BayStar's demands after all.
SCO has stated that the layoffs were needed to help that
all-important bottom line and to improve their ability to get their
UNIX product line out. I believe the first part of the statement,
but I am having trouble buying the second part. BayStar wants SCO
to become an IP litigation company. You don't need a lot of staff
and overhead for that.
And, please note: BayStar has not actually said it has pulled
that money out. They just warned SCO that they would if their
concerns were not addressed. Thus far, no action has been taken. I
believe the layoffs were the first sign that SCO is going to try
its hardest to meet BayStar's demands.
I see a second pattern emerging these days as well: the level of
rhetoric from Linden has plummeted to almost nothing these days.
Miss Darl McBride's inflammatory statements? You can bet BayStar
won't miss them.
So, who cares? After all, BayStar's bullying of SCO is a fun
sight to behold. SCO's demise is a good thing, right?
See, here's what I'm thinking: no, it's not.
Because if what I fear is true, a transformation of SCO into a
pure litigation firm is the exact thing Linux does not need. With
little to no overhead, a pure SCOSource-only company coould just
live the rest of its days as a clearinghouse for all the alleged
patent violations it could find. It could sue past customers for
breach of contracts. It could tie up litigation for years.
Of course, there's always a chance that SCO will ultimately
reject BayStar's plans. But since it is the duty of SCO's officers
to generate more money for the company's stockholders, they may
have to take the money being offered.
Today's Royal Bank conversion of SCO preferred stock may also
indicate that both companies are looking to just get out of SCO's
business altogether. Time will tell what the overall plan will be.
BayStar holds the big SCO investment cards now.
Can Linux survive this? Of course it can. But the pesky SCO
mosquito will have morphed into a nasty leech. It's still not
life-threatening, but it's much harder to detach.
As I said, I would not laugh at layoffs as a matter of
principle. But I don't think even the most hardened and jaded SCO
protester should laugh, either. Because, to me, this reduction in
force is just SCO sharpening its teeth to sink further into
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.