Editor's Note: Interesting Week, Interesting Future
May 13, 2005, 23:30 (14 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Brian Proffitt)
Re-Imagining Linux Platforms to Meet the Needs of Cloud Service Providers
By Brian Proffitt
Well! That was certainly an interesting week.
Monday we watched in dismay as unethical journalism tried to
bring down a community resource. Fortunately, a little common sense
prevailed, and said journalist has lost a big outlet for her work.
But, while many in the community cheered, the real culprits almost
got away clean.
Almost. As Don Marti, Editor in Chief of Linux Journal pointed
out in a comment over at James Turner's blog, how did
Maureen O'Gara know that phone calls from that NY apartment to the
Canopy Group? Kind of an obvious answer, if you think about it. No
wonder it's been so quiet out of Linden lately.
I'm sorry, but it would be nice to deal with some villains that
weren't so ridiculously inept, for a change. I mean, I don't think
we want to face off with Dr. Doom, but do we have to keep squaring
off with Leapfrog? (Obscure comic book reference, sorry.)
On the same day, Linux Today readers were mulling over a weekend
report about the Y2038 bug. While I think everyone would agree that
all bugs must die, having a lead-time of 33 years will be just
enough time. Heck, even OpenSolaris might be out by then. Or
Longhorn! Regardless, I will be 71 by then, and if I'm not wired to
one big earth-spanning mega-computer or retired in Fiji, who
Tuesday saw an interesting spin on a Veritest study of TCO--even
though the study was sponsored by Microsoft, the study revealed
that Linux was still the better operating system. Actually, that
Veritest study was released some time ago, and a lot of media
outlets reported it as a Microsoft victory, at least until they
noticed that the study paired up Windows Server 2003 against a Red
Hat Advanced 2.1 machine. Chagrined, the media outlets clammed up.
Except for Tuesday's CXOtoday story, which ingenously played it
straight and said (and here I paraphrase a smidge) "even though
Microsoft had better numbers, the Linux machine was still close.
Gee, just think what a current installation of Red Hat would
Good for you, plucky CXOtoday.
The other big story that reared up was the continuing debate
over the use of Java in OpenOffice.org. Some developers decided to
take off and make a non-caffinated version of OO.o. But, fearing a
big brouhaha right before the release of OO.o 2.0, the parties
involved announced today that they're on the way to mending
Wednesday saw the release of the story that would churn out the
most copy of the week, save for the Groklaw incident. That was the
revelation of a March dinner meeting between Steve Ballmer and Red
Hat's Matthew Szulik in Manhattan. The timing of that meeting
predates Microsoft Counsel Brad Smith's invitation for a sit-down
with various members of the open source community, which made me
wonder, whose idea was it for the powwow? Szulik, as a way to ease
general tensions against Redmond? Or Ballmer, who saw his meeting
with Szulik as a success he wanted to repeat?
A lot of speculation came out about that meeting, including
Thursday's notion of the possible acquistion of Red Hat by
Microsoft from Doc Searls. That was the big story on Thursday, and
it seems that the Linux community has a bit of a grudge with that
Redmond company. Gee, can't imagine why.
But, while I regard Doc Searls with highest esteem, I think he
might have been thinking too big for this one, though he almost
touched on what I think may be a possibility in his blog entry.
Remember: Microsoft does not make much money selling Windows. It
makes money with licensing other products, partcularly Office. So,
if I were Microsoft, would I see a bigger threat in Linux or
OpenOffice.org? Right now, I would have to say OpenOffice.org,
because it's cross-platform and growing fast in capabilities and
deployments. So, try this idea on for size: what if Ballmer was
talking to Szulik about an exclusive Red Hat distribution of Office
Weird, yes, but not as weird as Microsoft buying Red Hat
outright. It seems a plus for both sides, at least in my initial
analysis. Red Hat gets the rights to distribute Office with its
desktop products and differentiate itself from the other distros,
and Office makes it onto one more platform. And as for the "why
legitimize Linux with such a visible product?" argument, just look
at OS X for the answer. Microsoft has released Office for Macs for
a long time, and it didn't cut too much into its Windows market
share, did it?
Ballmer may have pitched this idea to Red Hat as part of a
broader plan to port Office to the *nix class of operating systems.
Port Office to Linux, and (if and when it gets working)
OpenSolaris' Janus could open another platform for Office.
And, Office might not be the application in question. It could
be something else. But my, would Office be the big announcement
that would blow people away. Especially timed with Longhorn. Linux
would be seen as benefiting from this play. But OpenOffice.org,
possibly a greater threat, would quietly be marginalized.
Like I said, an interesting week. And it looks like interesting
times are coming soon.