Yes, you read that right. I wrote "is saving." Not "will save"
or "has a chance to save."
How is this so? Forget, for a moment, that Linux is fast,
efficient, safe, and on and on. Forget that Linux is free and
capable of providing long-term inexpensive computing solutions to
users ranging from a migrant worker to a Fortune 500 CEO. These are
all true, but right now this is not germane to the point I am
making this week.
Linux, it seems, may be in some small way responsible for the
improvement of health and well-being of millions of
poverty-stricken and ill people around the planet.
That's because on Halloween we saw the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation make a significant grant to fighting malaria in Africa.
That would be the same Africa that is currently exploring options
in several nations to dump Microsoft products for free software,
Coincidence? Maybe. Given the timing of the three grants
totaling US$258 million, I have to wonder.
Let's be clear: the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has been
contributing to world health crises for many, many years. In many
different nations. Run a Google search and you will see them making
donations way before 2001 in nations that had or have nothing to do
with Linux. I will go on record as saying that I think the
charitable work they do is exemplary.
But that does not preclude using the timing of their gifts to
help sweeten the incentive to stick with Microsoft. This was first
noticed by me and a few other news reporters in the Fall of 2002,
when the Foundation donated US$100 million to combat AIDS in India.
At that time, the Indian government as well as several of its
states, were strongly contemplating a shift to free software. Bill
Gates himself visited India on a goodwill/business tour at roughly
the same time. Small wonder: at over 1 billion people, India
represents a very very strong market by anyone's standards.
And, curiously, Linux has yet to make big inroads in the Indian
Now, this week, we have the African donation to combat malaria.
But I cannot ignore the fact that Nigeria, Namibia, and South
Africa are all pushing for Linux desktop adoption, particularly in
schools. Tanzania and Mozambique are coming along as well. We
already saw Microsoft make significant and direct IT contributions
to schools in Africa. Is the malaria grant another way of saving
grace? Am I the only one to notice this?
The Foundation is going to donate money anyway. That's what it
does best. Why not donate in such a way, though, to help the
Foundation's chief moneymaker a bit?
If I am right, and if Linux adoption is slowed because of these
actions, then at least we will have the knowledge that at least
Linux's almost-presence may have helped saved some lives.
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.