There have been a couple of thought-provoking columns that have
been published recently that I wanted to add my own two cents. Not
that the authors of these missives were completely wrong in their
conclusions, But I think some added perspective is needed to
highlight that their points, while having some validity, still fall
short of where Linux is right now and how it's going to move
The first column is the most recently published: my colleague
Bruce Byfield's piece "It's
Time to Get Over Microsoft" that ran over on Datamation,
another Jupitermedia site. In it, he puts forth some pretty good
ideas about how Microsoft just isn't capable enough to completely
eliminate the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)
industry/movement, and that the community has much better things to
worry about than the suits in Redmond.
Now, to a large extent, I agree with Bruce. We all have much
better things to worry about than Microsoft. I can think of several
things right off the top of my head that are much more important,
like cleaning the leaves out of my gutters this weekend. Or
flossing my teeth. And he is correct in recommending that the level
of hatred be taken down a notch, or two, or three.
Even Bruce acknowledges that he doesn't expect his advice to be
universally accepted. Here, he demonstrates the realism that there
is a a very vocal minority in the FOSS community that will never,
ever stop despising Microsoft. My concern is, I don't believe
any of us should stop keeping at least one eye on what
Redmond is doing. Not to the point of obsession, but certainly to
the point of caution.
Here is the thing that must be remembered: for all its faults
and negative actions, Microsoft has done far more to shape the
present-day status of FOSS than almost any other company. Period.
Like winds and water eroding a mountain to a particular shape, the
actions of this one company have shaped Linux and the rest of FOSS
more than I think a lot of us would care to admit. Very often, it's
a reverse reaction: if Redmond goes one way, FOSS developers make
darn sure they go the opposite. But even negatively, the influence
More pragmatically, I think it is a fool's game to not think
that Microsoft is only tolerating FOSS until it figures out how to
(a) replace it or (b) remove it. Bruce does not think they can do
either, and maybe he's right. But I am very sure that Microsoft can
slow down the FOSS movement. He brings up the example of OOXML as a
serious non-challenge, because ultimately someone will find a hack
around this so-called open format. Of that I have no doubt, but how
many man-hours will be wasted trying to develop said hack? How many
Office deployments will go out at the expense of
Bruce is absolutely right when he says that taking on FOSS means
taking on the entire IT community. But that's an open fight. Don't
think Microsoft isn't above a rabbit punch when they think no one's
looking. Or any other proprietary company, for that matter.
Is this obsession? Or paranoia? Perhaps. But asking the
community to stop worrying about Microsoft is like asking a mother
bear to stop protecting her cubs. That's the one aspect of FOSS
that is rarely seen in the proprietary world: most of us have
played at least some small part in the creation of FOSS. We coded.
We tested. We used. We suggested. Whatever our role, FOSS
development allows many people to feel they are a part of creating
something bigger--how can we not feel protective? How can we not
To be fair, there are signs of a sea change within the offices
in Redmond. I have met some folks that are making genuine attempts
to reach out and explore what this concept of open source is about.
But until the day comes when all of Microsoft's executives lay down
their arms, somebody needs to stand watch.
I have no real difference of opinion of the content of the
article, in which Joe delves into the current status of Linux on
the desktop and sees a bright future--if not this year, but soon
after. His observations and opinions are spot on. My only problem
is the title and meme of the article itself: this whole "year of
the desktop" (YotD) notion has got to go.
The problem I have with the YotD idea is that no one, not even
me, really knows what the heck defines what a YotD is. Is it when
Linux dominates worldwide desktop deployments? Or when Linux is
recognized as a perfectly valid player in the desktop arena? Heck,
depending on what your criteria is, you can say that the YotD
happened the moment they plugged X Window into Linux.
I'm not anti-desktop--I want Linux to succeed in these arena
just like it's kicking butt and taking names in the supercomputing,
server, and embedded spaces. I think Linux does an excellent job on
the desktop now. My point is, who's going to define what success in
this area is? How many deployed systems must there be? How many
apps need to be ported?
In my opinion, there will really never be a YotD for Linux. I
think one day we're all going to wake up and look around and say
"hey, how did this happen? We're all using Linux!" A very similar
thing happened with the Internet. I was using the 'Net rather early
(Gopher! Aiee!), before the National Science Foundation released it
for commercial users. "Suddenly," around '98 or '99, all the major
news outlets were proclaiming it was the Year of the Internet.
Which I thought was hysterical, since I'd been using it for work
and recreation for years and some scientists and computer engineers
The same thing, I believe, with happen with Linux. It will
slowly creep up on the IT world until one day someone will notice
the landscape has been completely changed. At that time, the media
wags will declare the Year of the Linux Desktop, but that won't
really mark the tipping point--no one will really know when that
happened, unless we were really paying attention.
Like all good projects, the success of Linux on the desktop will
happen over time, not all at once. So maybe we can put away the
media hype this year. And the next.
LT is shifting into weekend/holiday mode until Monday,
November 26. For those of you celebrating here in the US, may you
have a safe and happy Thanksgiving. For the rest of the world, may
all your days be the same.
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.