Why Kindle Should Be An Open Book

Jul 06, 2009, 22:02 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Tim O'Reilly)

"So it was with a feeling of deja vu that I listened in mid-2007 to the promises of Amazon about the potential of its new proprietary e-book platform. While no payment is required to participate, there are clearly onerous restrictions that could limit the growth of the market: a proprietary file format, and the requirement that the e-books only be sold by Amazon.com.

"The file format was a problem for us from the get-go: Amazon's Kindle file format doesn't provide support for tables or for so-called monospaced fonts, two formatting features that we use heavily in our line of technical books. And there is a viable alternative: Epub, the open format from the International Digital Publishing Forum, is based on the Web's native format, HTML, and provides full table and font support. This is the first "strategy tax" paid by those who embrace proprietary platforms: They can't support the needs of every niche and must prioritize their support for mainstream needs."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Palm Delays SDK Release, Dismisses Homebrew Developers and Hackers(Jun 20, 2009)
• Amazon code release irrelevant, Kindle is still closed(Jun 20, 2009)
• DRM Hell(May 11, 2009)
• E Ink offers 9.7-inch panel to hardware developers(May 10, 2009)
• Mr. Bezos, Tear Down This Wall(May 06, 2009)
• Don't Cry For Disappearing Newspapers(May 01, 2009)
• Pulitzers, Broadcasters and Digital Denial(Apr 28, 2009)
• Microsoft Encarta died - why? And will its contents be lost?(Apr 17, 2009)
• On Newspapers and Google: What's the Real Problem Here? What Do Readers Want?(Apr 11, 2009)
• Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable(Mar 23, 2009)
• All Kindles Should be Virtual(Mar 05, 2009)
• Amazon Backtracks on Kindle Voice Feature(Mar 03, 2009)
• Linux dominates in Amazon Kindle competitors(Feb 27, 2009)