Comes Exhibit 2151 - Gates: "I have decided we should not publish these extensions." - Updated
Dec 01, 2009, 01:32 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Pamela Jones)
No-Size-Fits-All! An Application-Down Approach for Your Cloud Transformation REGISTER >
"The email is in an odd, hard-to-read font, so if anyone knows
the names are wrong, please let me know. We aim to get it right. I
have not corrected any typos.
"We are working to complete our Comes exhibit collection so you
can help us make it more easily searchable, and we also have all
the exhibits that were posted in the Minnesota antitrust case
against Microsoft, Gordon v. Microsoft and we'll be including them.
This exhibit is from that collection, actually. You can view it
here, from our Gordon v. Microsoft permanent page we are working on
again, and if you click on the graphic, it will get bigger. Click
again and it gets small. So if I'm quieter than usual for a bit,
that will be why.
"I wanted to mention that it was an anonymous commenter who
found this. Sometimes people tell me not to allow anonymous
comments, but this is why I never agree.
"You might find it interesting to compare this memo with Bill
Gates' July 20, 1995 letter to Novell's Robert Frankenberg,
Microsoft's Exhibit 15 [PDF] in its collection attached to its
Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. It's a hoot. Frankenberg had
complained about undocumented calls, and Gates writes that both the
FTC and the DOJ has "thoroughly investigated" the allegations and
found them to be "not provable". That was then. This is now. Here's
my favorite part of the letter:"
- Exhibits to Microsoft's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment in Novell WordPerfect Case(Nov 24, 2009)
- Eyewitness Report From Today's SCO Bankruptcy Hearing Re Wayne Gray and AutoZone(Nov 23, 2009)
- Why the GPL Sinks SCO's Copyright Infringement Claims, Even if it Owned the Copyrights(Nov 19, 2009)
- An Explanation of Computation Theory for Lawyers(Nov 13, 2009)
- 40 years of Multics, 1969-2009(Nov 12, 2009)
- Microsoft Patents Sudo?!!(Nov 11, 2009)
- In Re Bilski - Transcript of Today's Oral Argument at the US Supreme Court - Updated 3Xs(Nov 10, 2009)
- Cahn Seeks Court Approval of New Retention Agreement Terms for Boies Schiller(Nov 05, 2009)