Adding up the explanations for ACTA's "shameful secret"

"Why is an intellectual property treaty being negotiated in the name of the US public kept quiet as a matter of national security and treated as "some shameful secret"?

"Solid information on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has been hard to come by, but Google on Monday hosted a panel discussion on ACTA at its DC offices. Much of the discussion focused on transparency, and why there's so little of it on ACTA, even from an administration that has made transparency one of its key goals.

"The reason for that was obvious: there's little of substance that's known about the treaty, and those lawyers in the room and on the panel who had seen one small part of it were under a nondisclosure agreement.

"In most contexts, the lack of any hard information might lead to a discussion of mindnumbing generality and irrelevance, but this transparency talk was quite fascinating—in large part because one of the most influential copyright lobbyists in Washington was on the panel attempting to make his case."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Erroneous DMCA notices and copyright enforcement, part deux(Dec 21, 2009)
• EFF Sues Feds Over Social Network Surveillance(Dec 08, 2009)
• Yahoo Issues Takedown Notice for Spying Price List(Dec 07, 2009)
• EU ACTA Analysis Leaks: Confirms Plans For Global DMCA, Encourage 3 Strikes Model(Dec 01, 2009)
• The PC Privacy Battle at the Border(Nov 13, 2009)
• The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting the Pieces Together(Nov 09, 2009)
• Consumer Groups Outline Privacy Law Wish List(Sep 04, 2009)