"I'm speaking of Joe Barr's piece of tripe in LinuxWorld, where
he takes Microsoft to task -- calling them the "piracy police" --
for asking Virginia Beach, Va., to verify that no unauthorized
copies of Microsoft products were in use. (I'm not even going to
dignify the article with pointing you toward a URL and a cheap page
view.) Let's just say that Barr isn't a lawyer: he throws a lot of
stuff against a wall to see what sticks. He throws out legal
concepts like the presumption of innocence (which pertains only in
criminal law, not in civil law) and the role that anti-trust plays
in this case (Barr seems genuinely confused by the notion that
anti-trust laws exist to protect the consumer, not competitors) --
neither of which have a thing to do with basic contract law."
"The story in Virginia Beach is simple. Microsoft had a contract
that it wanted to enforce. It sent a letter to the municipality,
asking for verification that the terms of the contract were being
met -- a verification process that Virginia Beach agreed to when it
purchased the software. Nothing evil in this -- it happens in the
corporate world every day...."
"Bashing Microsoft does not elevate Linux. And bashing Microsoft
for enforcing a legal contract -- the type of contract, by the way,
that many other firms in the Linux community use -- doesn't even
rise to the level of flamebait. We in the Linux community should be
better than that."
Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which QuinStreet receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. QuinStreet does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.