Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.

More on LinuxToday

Editor's Note: Astaire, Garland, and a Chorus of Tapdancers

Sep 02, 2005, 23:30 (2 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Brian Proffitt)


Desktop-as-a-Service Designed for Any Cloud ? Nutanix Frame

By Brian Proffitt
Managing Editor

From where I sit, there are some interesting things going on in the world o' Linux and open source this week. The two that jumped out at me said "pay attention!" were the Unilever migration halt and the news from Massachusetts on open formats.

The Unilever story did not make me pause because it was a crushing blow to the cause of Linux; it wasn't. It made me pause because I haven't seen so much tapdancing since Fred Astaire put the moves on Judy Garland in Easter Parade. (See? I made the headline work. Did you think this was eWeek?)

Let your sage and crusty editor help shed a little light on the statements of Unilever CIO Neil Cameron. In an interview with Silicon.com, he said this:

"Suddenly I can do things with more proprietary products at a price performance that says actually the gap between that and open source isn't as wide as it was two years ago..."

That's 32 words that basically translate into "Microsoft cut us a deal." See, as a writer, I'm good with words that way. Actually, I am being unfair... in all likelihood, it should be "Sun cut us a deal," because it would be much easier to shift a UNIX-to-Linux migration to UNIX-to-Solaris than UNIX-to-Windows.

What tipped me off to this speculation? Was it my keen nose for news? Hardly. It was this statement from Cameron in the same interview: "The world moves on. That was run on a financial model and the reality of a financial model is the landscape changes and the model doesn't work anymore."

What the?

I give Mr. Cameron props for being right. Landscapes do change and financial models need to change with them. But from my perspective, if the landscape has changed that much in the last two years since Unilever embarked on this now-aborted migration, it has been in favor of Linux. But then, let's think about what's changed in the last couple of years. Hmmm... oh, yeah, Sun decoupled Solaris from proprietary hardware!

Hopefully, whatever solution Unilever is going with now will suit them well. But proprietary vendors are very good about short-term attractive pricing. It's that long term pricing you need to worry about.

Then there's the very cool move from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to shift to open formats. In and of itself, an excellent policy decision. (Especially for someone like me who sighs in quiet frustration whenever I get an attached Word document in an e-mail.)

Some of you were quick to point out that while my colleagues in the media were jumping on the controversy bandwagon and claiming this was the end of Microsoft Office in the Massachusetts government, it wasn't necessarily the death knell. Congrats, you get the Kewpie doll.

Microsoft isn't being excluded; nor is their cash cow application, Office. Only .doc, .xls, and .ppt. And while I am sure we all love the symbolism of yet another Boston festivity with Office boxes thrown into Boston Harbor, what will likely happen is that Microsoft will add OASIS format compliance to Office.

That could be even more of benefit to open source software than just Massachusetts whacking Office. Yes, that would be more fun but in the long run, Office compliance with OASIS formats means that the few remaining compatibility barriers between OpenOffice.org and Office would be gone. File sharing between the two suites would be seamless, and that would kick a huge door open for OpenOffice.org to enter the workplace desktop.

We will have to wait and see what Microsoft will do, of course. According to an article in the Boston Globe, "Alan Yates, general manager of Microsoft's information worker business strategy unit, indicated in an e-mailed statement that the company isn't interested in adopting the full OpenDocument standard."

So if this proposal goes through, expect to see some serious twists in the office-suite arena very soon.

Finally, I just wanted to mention a slightly disturbing set of occurences that I came upon this week. I'd call them a trend, but it might be too soon for that. While I was looking for news to post over the weekend, I found an anti-FUD piece out on Techworld, one of IDG's Web sites. But when I read the article, datelined September 2, 2005, it looked vaguely familiar. Since I hate running duplicate stories, I looked for it on LT's search engine.

Now, let's be clear: cross-posting is quite common among the various online media outlets. If CNET runs a story, then you can be darn sure the same story will appear on ZDNet, ZDNet UK, and ZDNet Antarctica within 24 hours. ECT News Network (LinuxInsider, TechNewsWorld, etc.) is bad about this, because they will cross-post their articles almost immediately, but they have some sort of reciprocal posting arrangement with IDG, so if I am not careful, I could run a LinuxInsider story that was on InfoWorld a week or so ago.

But for all of this cross-posting, usually the gap in time between publication is a day, maybe two. At most, two weeks.

The story I suspected was a duplicate on Techworld actually ran on another IDG site, CIO... on March 1, 2004. (We linked to it on March 11).

Here's my problem: running any analytical piece that's over a year old (whether it's for or against Linux) and passing it off as current is a bit irresponsible. It was a good article, but I imagine some stats could have been updated between then and now. A stale pro-Linux article can be a valid target for those nay-sayers looking for ammunition against the penguin.

Odds and Ends

  • This weekend marks a holiday weekend here in the US, and I will be taking full advantage of it. Accordingly, LT will be on the weekend schedule until Tuesday, September 6.
  • I have been asked to co-write the Enterprise Unix Review column on ServerWatch.com, replacing former LT editor Michael Hall there as he moves on to an upcoming JupiterWeb site. My duties on EUR should coincide well with things here in the Linux/Open Source channel, so feel free to read it when it comes out on Thursdays/Fridays. Word of warning: they use headshots of writers over there, so my photo may not be suitable for young and sensitive viewers.
  • Finally, there have been a lot of catastrophes, both natural and man-made, around the world this week. Wherever you are, if you can help, please do so in the manner best suited to your talents and beliefs. And get to know your neighbors. If disaster comes your way, your lives might depend on each other someday.