Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.

OSBC: What Red Hat, Microsoft, CBS Do for Open Source

Mar 26, 2008, 13:30 (1 Talkback[s])

eWeek: Red Hat: More Customer Involvement with Community Needed

"Red Hat hasn't done a good enough job of promoting its position as the leading Linux vendor, and also needs to do a better job of getting its customers involved with the community, Jim Whitehurst, Red Hat CEO and president, told attendees at the opening keynote at the Open Source Business Conference here March 25.

"'Our customers expect a lot more from us than we are currently delivering,' Whitehurst said. 'While we deliver the value of the community model to enterprises, we do a lousy job of getting those enterprises involved with the community...'"

Complete Story

The Open Road: OSBC Report: CBS Interactive, Open Source, and Innovation

"I've known Steve Pearson for a year or two, and have always been blown away by how aggressive his company, CBS Interactive, has been with adopting open source. MySQL, Linux, Spring, Lucene, etc. etc. The list of open-source projects that CBS Interactive deploys is long.

"Why? Why does CBS Interactive use open source...?"

Complete Story

The Open Road: OSBC Report: Microsoft Attempts to Cross the Chasm to Open Source

"Tonight Brad Smith, general counsel for Microsoft, delivered the 'footnote' address at the Open Source Business Conference 2008. I asked Brad to speak because I figured it was the shortest path to getting clarity from Microsoft vis-a-vis open source and the nettlesome legal issues that have plagued Microsoft's relationship with open source.

"Brad spoke for 30 minutes, and then participated in a follow-up panel with an A-list group from the open-source community, including Mark Shuttleworth (Ubuntu), James Bottomley (CTO, SteelEye and Linux kernel maintainer), Andrew Updegrove (standards lawyer extraordinaire), and Stephen O'Grady (Redmonk co-founder)..."

Complete Story

eWeek: What Can Open Source Learn from Microsoft?

"But, on a more serious note, Zemlin stressed that while Windows and Linux competed, Microsoft had become the de facto standard over time, while the Linux Foundation supported open standards.

"Microsoft also did several things well, including providing some degree of consistency for its platform, while the Linux community was still defining what the common standards were across projects and 'we could be doing a better job of that,' Zemlin said..."

Complete Story

Related Stories: