Deep in Microsoft's TomTom Linux patent claims

Mar 01, 2009, 06:04 (8 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols)

[ Thanks to Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols for this link. ]

"Long before this case appeared, the PUBPAT (Public Patent Foundation ) tried to get the '517 patent, which is the core patent of the trio, overturned. PUBPAT argued that there had been "previously unseen prior art showing the patent, ... was obvious and, as such, should have never been granted." However, in the end, the Foundation was unable to get the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to overturn the patents.

"To astute open-source legal observers, these patents have long been troubling. By requiring vendors to pay a royalty for their use, this could make it impossible for free software systems to read and write to FAT file systems, because their open-source licenses forbid royalty payments."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• News Analysis: Microsoft goes after TomTom -- and Linux(Feb 28, 2009)
• Patent suit tells us why we should shun Mono, Moonlight(Feb 27, 2009)
• Could Microsoft be trying to acquire TomTom?(Feb 27, 2009)
• Jones and Updegrove on Microsoft vs. TomTom(Feb 27, 2009)
• Is Microsoft finally taking Linux to court?(Feb 26, 2009)
• Microsoft sues TomTom over Linux and other patent claims(Feb 26, 2009)