Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 







Current Newswire:

3 Easy ways to try out Linux

Amahi Linux Home Server 4.2

Matthias Ettrich Receives German Federal Cross of Merit

Using Windows Is Like...

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?




UNIX System Administrator - SUN Solaris, Veritas, EMC, Shell Scripting, SAN (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Bruce Perens: Sun's StarOffice Release: Is It Really What You Think?
Bruce Perens: Sun's StarOffice Release: Is It Really What You Think?
Sep 7, 1999, 01 :10 UTC (9 Talkback[s]) (12426 reads)

(Other stories by Bruce Perens)

[ Thanks to Tim Hanson for this link. ]

"Recently Sun Microsystems released StarOffice for Linux, Windows, and other platforms, for download with no charge. They promised to release the StarOffice source code under the Sun Community Source License. This essay clears up some mis-reporting and discusses implications of the StarOffice release."

"Sun has released binary versions of StarOffice with a conventional restrictive license for download, and promises to soon release the source code under the Sun Community Source License (the SCSL). That license claims some of the benefits of Open Source, but is quite far from compliance with the Open Source Definition. Some press and industry pundits were confused by this, and erroneously announced StarOffice as Open Source software. However, I have seen no evidence that Sun represented that StarOffice was Open Source. Indeed, Sun has published an article that touches upon some differences between Open Source and the SCSL. The most important differences between the SCSL and Open Source licenses are that it allows research and internal use only, not commercial distribution, and that it severely restricts the distribution of modifications."

"Of course, it's a broadside at Microsoft, the largest threat to Sun's future revenues. The free StarOffice release is an attempt to eat into the profits MS derives from its own Office product, and to break an effective monopoly that MS holds on business software. Sun has assisted Linux and other operating systems on the principle of the enemy of my enemy is my friend, because those systems cut into Microsoft's operating-systems revenue and intrude upon their monopoly in the systems software market. Unfortunately, my enemy's enemy relationships often break down after the war, as the relationship between the Soviet Union's and the U.S., essential for beating the Nazis, became acrimonious after World War II ended. Linux systems on cheap commodity PC hardware are already cutting into Sun's server sales, no doubt this causes them concern."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Industry Standard: Monster Out of a Box: Sun Plans to Give Away Software (Sep 06, 1999)
Internet Week: Sun Touts Web-Based Productivity Apps (Sep 06, 1999)
InfoWorld: Will users win or lose if Sun's Star steals some light from Microsoft's Office (Sep 04, 1999)
PC Week: Microsoft crafts an answer to Sun's Star Division buy (Sep 02, 1999)
Wired: Sun Move Raises MS Eyebrows (Sep 02, 1999)
Washington Post: Sun Thinks It Has the Real Star (Sep 02, 1999)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
If they really wanted to hurt MicroSoft  ...   Why Not GPL   
DeskJock
Sep 7, 1999, 02:12:35
 
'cause that would be breaking stride ...   Why not GPL?   
David Fetter
Sep 7, 1999, 02:50:08
 
Why not the QPL? It will allow Sun to ma ...   Why not QPL   
David Johnson
Sep 7, 1999, 04:43:48
 

I believe that Sun is actually doing th ...   Re: Why not GPL?   
Bill Greenwood
Sep 7, 1999, 05:20:48
 
The author states the following:
Linux s ...   Sun could benefit greatly with Linux   
dc
Sep 7, 1999, 06:23:17
 
Eh?  The GPL is Microsoft poison.  They  ...   Re: Re: Why not GPL?   
Bill
Sep 7, 1999, 14:45:15
 
"I remember when (and I may be wrong in  ...   Bill Greenwood and lousy memories   
David Paschall-Zimbel
Sep 7, 1999, 14:46:42
 
Linux could help Sun greatly, but they w ...   Re: Sun could benefit greatly with Linux   
Bill
Sep 7, 1999, 15:12:50
 
The comment that since Star Office didn& ...   The Sun Factor   
Microserf
Sep 7, 1999, 19:29:21
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs